We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going through
some blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding changes. I
haven't gone through the full list yet (we started with 100).
I'm also building a list of potential FFE candidates based on:
1. How far along the chan
On 01.07.2016 23:03, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going through
> some blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding changes. I
> haven't gone through the full list yet (we started with 100).
>
> I'm also building a list of potential
-priority feature freeze and FFEs
On 01.07.2016 23:03, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going through
> some blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding changes. I
> haven't gone through the full list yet (we st
-priority feature freeze and FFEs
We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going through some
blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding changes. I haven't
gone through the full list yet (we started with 100).
I'm also building a list of pote
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: July 01, 2016 23:03
>
> We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going through
> some blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding changes. I
> haven't gone through the full
> The Hyper-V implementation of the bp virt-device-role-tagging is mergeable
> [1]. The patch is quite simple, it got some reviews, and the tempest test
> test_device_tagging [2] passed. [3]
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331889/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305120/
> [3] http
On 7/5/2016 4:31 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: July 01, 2016 23:03
We're now past non-priority feature freeze. I've started going through
some blueprints and -2ing them if they still have outstanding changes. I
On 7/5/2016 2:14 AM, tie...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I want to give more information about our nova patch for bp
ironic-serial-console-support. The whole feature needs work to be done in Nova
and Ironic. The nova bp [1] has been approved, and the Ironic spec [2] has been
merged.
This
nd Regards
TienDC
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 3:16 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Non-priority feature freeze and FFEs
On 7/5/2016 2:14 AM, tie...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote:
ck.org/#/c/293873/ (Ironic patch, merged)
Thanks and Regards
TienDC
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 3:16 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Non-priority feature freeze and FF
10 matches
Mail list logo