On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:55:20PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the resource tracker in Nova ignores that statistics that
are returned by the hypervisor and it calculates the values on its own. Not
only
On Oct 7, 2014, at 6:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:55:20PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the resource tracker in Nova ignores that statistics that
are
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 7, 2014, at 6:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:55:20PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the resource tracker in Nova ignores that statistics that are
returned by the hypervisor and it calculates the values on its own. Not only is
this highly error prone but it is also very costly - all of the resources on
the host are read from the database. Not only the fact
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 01:03:01PM +, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the resource tracker in Nova ignores that statistics that
are returned by the hypervisor and it calculates the values on its own.
Not only is this highly error prone but it is also very costly - all of
the
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
At the moment the resource tracker in Nova ignores that statistics that
are returned by the hypervisor and it calculates the values on its own. Not
only is this highly error prone but it is also very costly – all of
