On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 09:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > On 6/21/2016 12:53 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> >> So, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317739 is basically done I think.
> >> I'm after people's thoughts on:
> >>
> >> - I need to do some more
On 06/22/2016 09:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 12:53 AM, Michael Still wrote:
>> So, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317739 is basically done I think.
>> I'm after people's thoughts on:
>>
>> - I need to do some more things, as described in the commit message.
>> Are we ok with them
On 6/21/2016 12:53 AM, Michael Still wrote:
So, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317739 is basically done I think.
I'm after people's thoughts on:
- I need to do some more things, as described in the commit message.
Are we ok with them being in later patches to get reviews moving on this?
I'd
So, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317739 is basically done I think. I'm
after people's thoughts on:
- I need to do some more things, as described in the commit message. Are
we ok with them being in later patches to get reviews moving on this?
- I'm unsure what level of tempest testing makes
