As there has been a bunch of concern around patches getting lost or
stuck, I wanted to re-announce the fact that we've got a dedicated slot
at the weekly Nova meeting for just those sorts of things.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
The "Stuck reviews" time blo
Sean Dague said on Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:51:30AM -0500:
> As there has been a bunch of concern around patches getting lost or
> stuck, I wanted to re-announce the fact that we've got a dedicated slot
> at the weekly Nova meeting for just those sorts of things.
The slot turned into everyone talki
On 05/02/15 15:02, Alexis Lee wrote:
> Sean Dague said on Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:51:30AM -0500:
>> As there has been a bunch of concern around patches getting lost or
>> stuck, I wanted to re-announce the fact that we've got a dedicated slot
>> at the weekly Nova meeting for just those sorts of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
> May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
> items, then work through them 1 by 1. Or, we take items one by one
> according to who shouts fastest but ask people not to interrupt.
Or how
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
>
> > May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
> > items, then work through them 1 by 1. Or, we take items one by one
> >
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
>>
>>> May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
>>> items, then wor
On 2/5/2015 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to
LOL :)
-- dims
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/5/2015 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA
Le 05/02/2015 17:54, Sean Dague a écrit :
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase t
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:13:50PM +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> I was always considering stuck reviews as reviews where 2 or more cores were
> disagreeing between themselves so that it was needing a debate discussion
> during the meeting.
I was under the same impression.
Stuck reviews were for
Certainly it was my intent when I created that agenda item to cover
reviews that wouldn't otherwise reach a decision -- either two cores
wedged, or something else that we can't resolve trivially in gerrit.
Now, I can see that people don't like reviews sitting for a long time,
but that's probably t
Ok, my bad. When I proposed this part of the Nova meeting I was also
thinking about "lost" patches where a couple of weeks had gone by
without any negative feedback and the patch author got a chance to
advocate for it. That's how we used it in Tempest meetings.
The theory being that engaging in mo
On 2/6/2015 7:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Ok, my bad. When I proposed this part of the Nova meeting I was also
thinking about "lost" patches where a couple of weeks had gone by
without any negative feedback and the patch author got a chance to
advocate for it. That's how we used it in Tempest meet
13 matches
Mail list logo
