I just found this one created recently, and I will try to build on top of it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/371807/12
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> Refloating this thread.
>
> I posted this rfe/bug [1], and I'm planning to come up with an
> experimental j
Refloating this thread.
I posted this rfe/bug [1], and I'm planning to come up with an
experimental job that triggers one of the basic neutron/lbaas tests
with octavia.
I wonder if even picking up the scenario one for now could make sense,
it's not very stable at the moment, but may be spreading
Hi,
"need to have something (tempest-plugin) to make sure that integration
works with nova & neutron" - Its easy to write scenarios that will test
that octavia works with nova and neutron
"I guess rally is more suited to make sure that things work at scale, to
uncover any sort of race condition
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> Miguel--
>
> There have been a number of tempest patches in the review queue for a long
> time now, but I think the reason they're not getting attention is that we
> don't want to have to import a massive amount of tempest code into our
>
Miguel--
There have been a number of tempest patches in the review queue for a long
time now, but I think the reason they're not getting attention is that we
don't want to have to import a massive amount of tempest code into our
repository (which will become stale and need hot-fixing, as has happe
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Kosnik, Lubosz wrote:
> Great work with that multi-node setup Miguel.
Thanks, I have to get my hands dirtier with octavia, it's just a tiny thing.
> About that multinode Infra is supporting two nodes setup used currently by
> grenade jobs but in my opinion we don
Thank you!! :)
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Michael Johnson wrote:
> Miguel,
>
> Thank you for your work here. I would support an effort to setup a
> multi-node gate job.
>
> Michael
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
> wrote:
>> Recently, I sent a series of patche
Miguel,
Thank you for your work here. I would support an effort to setup a
multi-node gate job.
Michael
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> Recently, I sent a series of patches [1] to make it easier for
> developers to deploy a multi node octavia controller with
>
Great work with that multi-node setup Miguel.
About that multinode Infra is supporting two nodes setup used currently by
grenade jobs but in my opinion we don’t have any tests which can cover that
type of testing. We’re still struggling with selecting proper tool to test
Octavia from integration
Recently, I sent a series of patches [1] to make it easier for
developers to deploy a multi node octavia controller with
n_controllers x [api, cw, hm, hk] with an haproxy in front of the API.
Since this is the way the service is designed to work (with horizontal
scalability in mind), and we want t
10 matches
Mail list logo
