Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-13 Thread Jay Pipes
On 11/11/2013 12:21 PM, Jay S Bryant wrote: Mark, Well stated. I think it is important that OpenStack continue to be focussed on individuals contributing to the community and not corporations. There are plenty of metrics already being compiled using e-mail addresses. In fact, I think the visi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/11/2013 06:47 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > > >> IMHO, lets call this what it is: "marketing". > >> > >> I'm fine with the idea of a company wanting to have recognition for work > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/11/2013 06:47 PM, John Griffith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange >> IMHO, lets call this what it is: "marketing". >> >> I'm fine with the idea of a company wanting to have recognition for work >> that they fund. They can achieve this by putting out a press releas

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Rochelle.Grober
I just looked at the Gerrit docs and saw that there is a "your category here" option that would allow adding a category to the already existing ones. It can be set as blocking (not what we would want) or non-blocking. I think this could be used to credit a sponsor ("courtesy of") without mucki

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Anne Gentle
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 12:09 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > What about something with attribution in the docs for the feature? Can > > we play around with that a while? Attribution is going to have to be > > incorporated better into the docs for the CC

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Jay S Bryant
nstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base Hi Nick, On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > Dear TC members, > > Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the > patches they mission us to m

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/11/2013 12:08 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >>> Hi Nick, >>> >>> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encour

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-11-11 10:49, Davanum Srinivas wrote: @Ben, Metrics tools i believe are already using information in the .mailmap file (see nova's for example). Having just been through this process, I'm afraid not. :-) Stackalytics uses https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/def

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > >> Dear TC members, > >> > >> Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the > >> p

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/11/2013 11:41 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> Hi Nick, >> >> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: >>> Dear TC members, >>> >>> Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the >>> patches they missi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Davanum Srinivas
@Ben, Metrics tools i believe are already using information in the .mailmap file (see nova's for example). -- dims On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 2013-11-11 09:57, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> >> Hi Nick, >> >> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: >>> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: >> Dear TC members, >> >> Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the >> patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-11-11 09:57, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hi Nick, On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to encourage thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi Nick, On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > Dear TC members, > > Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the > patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to > encourage this behavior from them and others, it woul