Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-10 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/10/2014 12:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/10/2014 11:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 06/10/2014 09:53 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/10/2014 09:14 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 06/10/2014 04:33 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 20:14 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-09 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/09/2014 03:17 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > So there are certain words that mean certain things, most don't, some do. If words that mean certain things are used then some folks start using the word and have expectations around the word and the OpenStack Technical Comm

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-09 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> >> So there are certain words that mean certain things, most don't, some do. > >> > >> If words that mean certain things are used then some folks start using > >> the word and have expectations around the word and the OpenStack > >> Technical Committee and other OpenStack programs find themselv

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-09 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> On 9 June 2014 09:44, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > Since "certification" seems to be quite an overloaded term > > already, I wonder would a more back-to-basics phrase such as > > "quality assured" better capture the Cinder project's use of > > the word? > > > > It does exactly what it says on th

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-09 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 9 June 2014 09:44, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > Since "certification" seems to be quite an overloaded term > already, I wonder would a more back-to-basics phrase such as > "quality assured" better capture the Cinder project's use of > the word? > > It does exactly what it says on the tin ... i.e. cap

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-09 Thread Eoghan Glynn
- Original Message - > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin < mar...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: > > The issue I have with the word certify is that it requires someone or a > > group of someones to attest to somet

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-08 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi John, On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:59 -0600, John Griffith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, John Griffith > wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin > wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: > > The issue I

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-06 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: >> > The issue I have with the word certify is that it requires someone or a >> > group of someones to attest to something

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-06 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: > > The issue I have with the word certify is that it requires someone or a > > group of someones to attest to something. The thing attested to is only > > as credible as the someone or t

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-06 Thread Russell Bryant
On 06/06/2014 03:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> So there are certain words that mean certain things, most don't, some do. >> >> If words that mean certain things are used then some folks start using >> the word and have expectations around the wo