Hi all,
I was working on the OSC plugin of my project and trying to choose a CLI
option to represent the availability zone of the container. When I came
across the existing commands, I saw some inconsistencies on the naming.
Some commands use the syntax '--zone ', while others use the syntax
'--av
On 12/02/18 04:18, Hongbin Lu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working on the OSC plugin of my project and trying to choose a CLI
> option to represent the availability zone of the container. When I came
> across the existing commands, I saw some inconsistencies on the naming.
> Some commands use the
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote:
> I was working on the OSC plugin of my project and trying to choose a CLI
> option to represent the availability zone of the container. When I came
> across the existing commands, I saw some inconsistencies on the naming. Some
> commands use the
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Graham Hayes wrote:
> Please please move to `availability-zone` - zone is a DNS zone (seen as
> Keystone took Domain :) ) within OSC.
As stated in another message, changing the Compute usage of --zone
makes sense for OSC 4. Two additional things here:
* Command
On 12/02/18 14:51, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Graham Hayes wrote:
>> Please please move to `availability-zone` - zone is a DNS zone (seen as
>> Keystone took Domain :) ) within OSC.
>
> As stated in another message, changing the Compute usage of --zone
> makes sense f
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Graham Hayes wrote:
> OSC only predates Designate by 5 months ...
My bad, I didn't check dates.
> "Zone" was what we were recommend to use by the OSC devs at the time we
> wrote our OSC plugin, and at the time we were also *not* supposed to
> name space commands
keystone may have taken "domain", but it didn't take "dns-domain"
Dean Troyer wrote on 02/12/2018 10:24:05 AM:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Graham Hayes wrote:
> > OSC only predates Designate by 5 months ...
>
> My bad, I didn't check dates.
>
> > "Zone" was what we were recommend to us
On 12/02/18 16:04, William M Edmonds wrote:
> keystone may have taken "domain", but it didn't take "dns-domain"
No, but the advice at the time was to move to zone, and match DNS
RFCs, and not namespace objects with the service type.
We moved from "domain" -> "zone" and "records" -> "recordsets" i
Graham Hayes wrote on 02/12/2018 11:17:45 AM:
> On 12/02/18 16:04, William M Edmonds wrote:
> > keystone may have taken "domain", but it didn't take "dns-domain"
>
> No, but the advice at the time was to move to zone, and match DNS
> RFCs, and not namespace objects with the service type.
>
I was
