> On Jan 28, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
>> I know we have some projects (heat, I think?) that don't have UUIDs at
>> all. Are they using oslo.versionedobjects? I suppose we could move them
>> to a string field instead of a UUID field, instead of flipping the
>> enforcement flag on. Alt
On 1/28/2016 11:01 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
I know we have some projects (heat, I think?) that don't have UUIDs at
all. Are they using oslo.versionedobjects? I suppose we could move them
to a string field instead of a UUID field, instead of flipping the
enforcement flag on. Alternately, if we add a
> I know we have some projects (heat, I think?) that don't have UUIDs at
> all. Are they using oslo.versionedobjects? I suppose we could move them
> to a string field instead of a UUID field, instead of flipping the
> enforcement flag on. Alternately, if we add a new class we wouldn't have
> to eve
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
> Ryan Rossiter wrote:
>>
>> As the-guy-in-nova-that-does-this-a-bunch, I’ve pushed a bunch of changes to
>> nova because we didn’t have them yet in o.vo, and once they get released, I
>> “re-sync” them back to nova to use the o.vo version
Ryan Rossiter wrote:
As the-guy-in-nova-that-does-this-a-bunch, I’ve pushed a bunch of changes to
nova because we didn’t have them yet in o.vo, and once they get released, I
“re-sync” them back to nova to use the o.vo version, see:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272641/
https://github.com/o
Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 20:42:39 +:
> On 28/01/2016 20:16, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 19:17:54 +:
> >> On 28/01/2016 18:54, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/28/2016 01:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
>>> Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project.
>>>
>>> After playing around with it for a whil
On 28/01/2016 20:16, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 19:17:54 +:
>> On 28/01/2016 18:54, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a proje
Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 19:17:54 +:
> On 28/01/2016 18:54, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
> >> Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project.
> >>
> >> After playing around with it fo
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 19:02:57 +:
>> On 28/01/2016 18:44, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> Graham,
>>>
>>> Quite unfair characterization of Oslo being -2 heavy. Please compare
>>> stats before making such an as
Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 19:02:57 +:
> On 28/01/2016 18:44, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Graham,
> >
> > Quite unfair characterization of Oslo being -2 heavy. Please compare
> > stats before making such an assertion:
>
> OK - that was probably my frustration boiling o
On 28/01/2016 19:13, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
> On 01/28/2016 01:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
>>>
>>> The steps I had looked at doing was this:
>>>
>>> 1. Allow a "validate" flag on the Field __init__() defaulting to False.
>>> 1.1
On 28/01/2016 18:54, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
>> Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project.
>>
>> After playing around with it for a while, I noticed I could set "this is
>> not a uuid" as the value of a UUI
On 01/28/2016 01:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
>> Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project.
>>
>> After playing around with it for a while, I noticed I could set "this is
>> not a uuid" as the value of
On 28/01/2016 18:44, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Graham,
>
> Quite unfair characterization of Oslo being -2 heavy. Please compare
> stats before making such an assertion:
OK - that was probably my frustration boiling over at the time. I should
not have made that generalization. I had been involved i
Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-01-28 17:01:09 +:
> Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project.
>
> After playing around with it for a while, I noticed I could set "this is
> not a uuid" as the value of a UUIDField.
>
> After making sure I made no mistak
Graham,
Quite unfair characterization of Oslo being -2 heavy. Please compare
stats before making such an assertion:
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/oslo-reviewers-365.txt
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/nova-reviewers-365.txt
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/neutron-revi
Hayes, Graham wrote:
Also, olso seem to be very-2 heavy. This means that alternative views
on the review are very unlikely. My question is what is the difference
between a-1 and a-2 for oslo?
If this is the case I am sorry about it, and I'd also like to think that
we (as the oslo team) need
Recently I tried started to use oslo.versionedobjects for a project.
After playing around with it for a while, I noticed I could set "this is
not a uuid" as the value of a UUIDField.
After making sure I made no mistakes - I looked at the underlying code,
and found:[0]
class UUID(FieldType):
19 matches
Mail list logo