Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [keystone] rolling dogpile.core into dogpile.cache, removing namespace packaging (PLEASE REVIEW)

2016-06-01 Thread Mike Bayer
Just a reminder, dogpile.cache is doing away with namespace packaging in version 0.6.0, due for the end of this week or sometime next week. dogpile.core is being retired and left as-is. No changes should be needed by anyone using only dopgile.cache. On 05/30/2016 06:17 PM, Mike Bayer

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [keystone] rolling dogpile.core into dogpile.cache, removing namespace packaging (PLEASE REVIEW)

2016-05-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/31/2016 12:17 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > Hi all - > > Just a heads up what's happening for dogpile.cache, in version 0.6.0 we > are rolling the functionality of the dogpile.core package into > dogpile.cache itself, and retiring the use of namespace package naming > for dogpile.cache. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [keystone] rolling dogpile.core into dogpile.cache, removing namespace packaging (PLEASE REVIEW)

2016-05-30 Thread Monty Taylor
On 05/30/2016 06:17 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > Hi all - > > Just a heads up what's happening for dogpile.cache, in version 0.6.0 we > are rolling the functionality of the dogpile.core package into > dogpile.cache itself, and retiring the use of namespace package naming > for dogpile.cache. > >

[openstack-dev] [oslo] [keystone] rolling dogpile.core into dogpile.cache, removing namespace packaging (PLEASE REVIEW)

2016-05-30 Thread Mike Bayer
Hi all - Just a heads up what's happening for dogpile.cache, in version 0.6.0 we are rolling the functionality of the dogpile.core package into dogpile.cache itself, and retiring the use of namespace package naming for dogpile.cache. Towards retiring the use of namespace packaging, the