Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-06-22 Thread Joshua Harlow
Any progress on this? Let me know and if not I can throw something together to (if you are busy or pre-occupied, or other) :) -Josh Joshua Harlow wrote: Feel free to add it, or open a blueprint, or make a spec to :) Any of the above are ok with me. I did start prototyping something @ https

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-29 Thread Joshua Harlow
Gorka Eguileor wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:51:35AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Btw, if u *do not* want to do a spec (using [1]) or blueprint let me know and I'll probably make a spec so that we can ensure (and agree on) the semantics of this because the specifics of what 'cancel' or 'abort

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-29 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:51:35AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Btw, if u *do not* want to do a spec (using [1]) or blueprint let me know > and I'll probably make a spec so that we can ensure (and agree on) the > semantics of this because the specifics of what 'cancel' or 'abort' means > start to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Joshua Harlow
Btw, if u *do not* want to do a spec (using [1]) or blueprint let me know and I'll probably make a spec so that we can ensure (and agree on) the semantics of this because the specifics of what 'cancel' or 'abort' means start to matter. [1] https://github.com/openstack/oslo-specs/blob/master/sp

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Joshua Harlow
Feel free to add it, or open a blueprint, or make a spec to :) Any of the above are ok with me. I did start prototyping something @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184663/ (external cancellation) but it might be going in the wrong direction (or a different direction); so feel free to comment

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 28/05/15 07:34 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Flavio, PIka is an unknown quantity at the moment as none of us have touched it. It was brought up by rabbitmq folks. So someone should look at it. We don't have have enough info either to say we should use Pika by itself or as a kombu driver. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Flavio, yay! :) -- dims On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 28/05/15 07:34 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> >> Flavio, >> >> PIka is an unknown quantity at the moment as none of us have touched >> it. It was brought up by rabbitmq folks. So someone should look at it. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Flavio, PIka is an unknown quantity at the moment as none of us have touched it. It was brought up by rabbitmq folks. So someone should look at it. We don't have have enough info either to say we should use Pika by itself or as a kombu driver. We may have to make that determination at some point i

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 27/05/15 10:24 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Thanks dims! indeed, thanks. [snip] Also for the pika one, I'd really like to understand why not kombu. I don't know enough of the background, but from that session it looks like we need to do some comparative analysis (and imho get feedback f

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Please add it Gorka. thanks, dims On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:47:42AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> Here are the etherpads from the summit[1]. > > I remember that in Taskflow's Fishbowl session we discussed not only > pau

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-28 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:47:42AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Hi Team, > > Here are the etherpads from the summit[1]. I remember that in Taskflow's Fishbowl session we discussed not only pause/yield option but abort/cancel for long running tasks as well, but reviewing the Etherpad now I don

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-27 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Josh, thanks. yes, the kombu vs pika is just a research thing someone should look at. no blueprint, no spec, so not approved in anyway :) -- dims On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Thanks dims! > > Good write up, > > Other things I noted (more controversial ones); is that w

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-27 Thread Joshua Harlow
Thanks dims! Good write up, Other things I noted (more controversial ones); is that we need to come up with a concurrency strategy (and/or guidelines, and/or best practices). At least I feel this will be a way that works and imho implies that one concurrency strategy will (likely) not fit eve

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Updates from the Summit

2015-05-27 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Hi Team, Here are the etherpads from the summit[1]. Some highlights are as follows: Oslo.messaging : Took status of the existing zmq driver, proposed a new driver in parallel to the existing zmq driver. Also looked at possibility of using Pika with RabbitMQ. Folks from pivotal promised to help wit