On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>
>>> Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
>>
>> We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as
>> fixes end up needi
Doug Hellmann wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
>
> We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as
> fixes end up needing to be backported. We have already done this in a few
> ca
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
We will possibly have point or patch releases based on those branches, as fixes
end up needing to be backported. We have already done this in a few cases,
which is w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Are we going to have stable releases for those branches?
On 01/12/14 15:19, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> As part of setting up version caps for Oslo and client libraries in
> the stable branches, we discovered that the fact that we do not
> always create
As part of setting up version caps for Oslo and client libraries in the stable
branches, we discovered that the fact that we do not always create stable
branches of the Oslo libraries means the check-requirements-integration-dsvm
job in stable branches is actually looking at the requirements in