We rather quickly came to consensus at the summit that we should drop the use
of namespace packages in Oslo libraries [1]. As far as I could tell, everyone
was happy with my proposed approach [2] of moving the code from oslo.foo to
oslo_foo and then creating a backwards-compatibility shim in osl
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> We rather quickly came to consensus at the summit that we should drop the use
> of namespace packages in Oslo libraries [1]. As far as I could tell, everyone
> was happy with my proposed approach [2] of moving the code from oslo.foo to
>
On 01/05/2015 04:51 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
As each library is released, we will send release notes to this list, as usual. At that point
the Oslo liaisons should start planning patches to change imports in their projects from
"oslo.foo" to “oslo_foo". The old imports should still work for now
> On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> On 01/05/2015 04:51 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> As each library is released, we will send release notes to this list, as
>> usual. At that point the Oslo liaisons should start planning patches to
>> change imports in their projects from
We talked about this in Cinder. I am planning to create some hacking
checks for us just to be safe. Shouldn't take a ton of effort.
Jay
On Jan 8, 2015 12:03 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>
> > On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/05/2015 04:51 PM, Doug Hellmann wr
OK, I was going to implement something for neutron, but if you're going
to handle it quickly till the end of the week, I'll wait to steal. ;)
On 01/08/2015 07:14 PM, Jay Bryant wrote:
We talked about this in Cinder. I am planning to create some hacking
checks for us just to be safe. Should
On 01/08/2015 07:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I’m not sure that’s something we need to enforce. Liaisons should be updating
projects now as we release libraries, and then we’ll consider whether we can
drop the namespace packages when we plan the next cycle.
Without a hacking rule, there is a c
Ihar,
I agree that we should do something to enforce using the appropriate
namespace so that we don't have the wrong usage sneak in.
I haven't gotten any rules written yet. Have had to attend to a family
commitment the last few days. Hope that I can tackle the namspace
changes next week.
Jay,
I have a hacking rule in nova already [1] and am updating the rule in
the 3 reviews i have for oslo_utils, oslo_middleware and oslo_config
[2] in Nova
thanks,
dims
[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/hacking/checks.py#L452
[2]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open
You rock, man. Thanks, I'll steal those. :)
/Ihar
On 01/11/2015 09:39 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jay,
I have a hacking rule in nova already [1] and am updating the rule in
the 3 reviews i have for oslo_utils, oslo_middleware and oslo_config
[2] in Nova
thanks,
dims
[1] https://github.com/ope
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> We rather quickly came to consensus at the summit that we should drop the use
> of namespace packages in Oslo libraries [1]. As far as I could tell, everyone
> was happy with my proposed approach [2] of moving the code from oslo.foo to
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
