On 08/01/2014 03:29 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:14:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>On 2014-07-30 14:59:09 -0400 (-0400), Ken Giusti wrote:
>>> Thanks Daniel. It was my understanding - which may be wrong - that
>>> having devstack install the 'out of band' packages would only h
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:14:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>On 2014-07-30 14:59:09 -0400 (-0400), Ken Giusti wrote:
>> Thanks Daniel. It was my understanding - which may be wrong - that
>> having devstack install the 'out of band' packages would only help in
>> the case of the devstack-based integr
It seems like this is precisely what the functional test setup was designed
to handle. Is there a reason you don't want to run them as functional tests
instead of unit tests?
As functional tests, nobody would need new prereqs just to make it through
unit tests and anyone that wants to do the full
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:04:41 -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>On 7/30/2014 11:59 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
Greetings,
>> At this point, there are no integration tests that
On 2014-07-30 14:59:09 -0400 (-0400), Ken Giusti wrote:
> Thanks Daniel. It was my understanding - which may be wrong - that
> having devstack install the 'out of band' packages would only help in
> the case of the devstack-based integration tests, not in the case of
> CI running the unit tests.
On 7/30/2014 11:59 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
Greetings,
Apologies for the cross-post: this should be of interest to both infra
and olso.messaging developers.
The blueprint [
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:25:46 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Apologies for the cross-post: this should be of interest to both infra
> > and olso.messaging developers.
> >
> > The blueprint [0] that adds support fo
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:01AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Apologies for the cross-post: this should be of interest to both infra
> and olso.messaging developers.
>
> The blueprint [0] that adds support for version 1.0 of the AMQP messaging
> protocol is blocked due to CI test f
Greetings,
Apologies for the cross-post: this should be of interest to both infra
and olso.messaging developers.
The blueprint [0] that adds support for version 1.0 of the AMQP messaging
protocol is blocked due to CI test failures [1]. These failures are due
to a new package dependency this bluep