Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-05-05 07:53:20 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: [...] release weekly [...] I'm fine with releasing weekly when there's something to release, but as PBR is somewhat stabilized and relatively tightly scoped I _hope_ that we get to the point where we don't have bugs or new features in

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Dave Walker
On 4 May 2015 at 23:01, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-05-05 07:53:20 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: [...] release weekly [...] I'm fine with releasing weekly when there's something to release, but as PBR is somewhat stabilized and relatively tightly scoped I _hope_

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
Hi Dave :) On 5 May 2015 at 10:37, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote: ... Hey, As someone that did track master PBR Master for internal cross-project builds during the SemanticVersioning ping-pong, I have to agree that having a core tool that should be pretty static in feature deliverable

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to call the current master as 1.0 +1 to more frequent releases (not sure if it should be every monday though!) -- dims On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Hi, I'd like to talk about how often we can and should release pbr, and what criteria we

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
On 5 May 2015 at 08:04, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I don't understand what you mean by zero real world testing of master. We test that pbr can make sdists and install packages on every change to master before merging

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 05/04/2015 03:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, I'd like to talk about how often we can and should release pbr, and what criteria we should use for 1.0. tl;dr: release weekly [outside of organisation-wide-freezes], do a 1.0 immediately. pbr, like all our libraries affects everything

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 05/04/2015 04:15 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 5 May 2015 at 08:12, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 05/04/2015 03:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I'm fine with that in principle - I tend to release personal libraries pretty much as soon as something interesting hits them. I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, May 4, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, I'd like to talk about how often we can and should release pbr, and what criteria we should use for 1.0. tl;dr: release weekly [outside of organisation-wide-freezes], do a 1.0 immediately. pbr, like all our libraries affects

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
On 5 May 2015 at 08:12, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 05/04/2015 03:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I'm fine with that in principle - I tend to release personal libraries pretty much as soon as something interesting hits them. I have no personal fear of high release counts. I'm

[openstack-dev] [pbr] regular releases, and path to 1.0

2015-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
Hi, I'd like to talk about how often we can and should release pbr, and what criteria we should use for 1.0. tl;dr: release weekly [outside of organisation-wide-freezes], do a 1.0 immediately. pbr, like all our libraries affects everything when its released, but unlike everything else in oslo,