Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Telles Nobrega wrote: > First of all, thanks for putting this up and the organization looks > good. I just want to remove that ? from Sahara on Friday. > We discussed and we believe that Wednesday and Thursday will be suffice. Thanks Telles! I updated the high-level schedule. -- Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-12 Thread Telles Nobrega
First of all, thanks for putting this up and the organization looks good. I just want to remove that ? from Sahara on Friday. We discussed and we believe that Wednesday and Thursday will be suffice. Best regards, On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:29 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-02 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a >> purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more >> inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread John Dickinson
On 1 Jun 2017, at 7:38, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a >> purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more >> inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments >> were positive. >> >> We

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Looks good! What is approximate size of L room? L can fit 30-50 people. We'll get more precise once we start mapping those to actual rooms. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
On 1 June 2017 at 09:22, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-01 16:38:05 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] >> For teams that are placed on the Wednesday-Friday segment, please >> let us know whether you'd like to make use of the room on Friday >> (pick between 2 days

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-01 16:38:05 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > For teams that are placed on the Wednesday-Friday segment, please > let us know whether you'd like to make use of the room on Friday > (pick between 2 days or 3 days). [...] As you didn't specify how to let you know, I'll just

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: > In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a > purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more > inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments > were positive. > > We need to solidify how the week will look like before we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-25 Thread Amrith Kumar
Thierry, Thanks for doing this. Two specific points below. 1. You can schedule Trove for Wednesday and Thursday, skip the Friday. 2. Similar to the idea of splitting the project things from the cross project/infra things, would it be possible to have projects try and keep their project specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Sean McGinnis
On 05/24/2017 02:21 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 13:25:21 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] Well, it could be more encouraging this time if the tables aren't connected together making it difficult to easily rearrange them. :] A very good point I've now passed along to them,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-05-24 13:25:21 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > Well, it could be more encouraging this time if the tables aren't > connected together making it difficult to easily rearrange them. :] A very good point I've now passed along to them, along with a suggestion to make up a bunch of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Sean McGinnis
We did end up moving tables closer together from their original huge square layout In the Ironic room we also had to move tables a bit closer. They were really far apart, and not all contributors where comfortable with raising their voice. [...] The organizers tried really hard to convey that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-05-24 18:11:12 +0200 (+0200), Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/24/2017 05:57 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > > It was mostly just due to the layout of the tables [...] > > We did end up moving tables closer together from their original > > huge square layout > > In the Ironic room we also

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/24/2017 05:57 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On 05/24/2017 10:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Sean McGinnis
On 05/24/2017 10:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the discussions. [...] Was the room actually full, or were

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Alexandra Settle
On 5/24/17, 4:34 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-24 16:44:44 +0200: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Two questions about theme-based initiatives: > > > > I would like to have a discussion about the work to stop

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-24 16:44:44 +0200: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Two questions about theme-based initiatives: > > > > I would like to have a discussion about the work to stop syncing > > requirements and to see if we can make progress on the implementation > > while

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-05-24 08:28:56 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > In ATL the Cinder room was very large, to the point that it was > actually a little difficult hearing some people for some of the > discussions. [...] Was the room actually full, or were people just failing to properly huddle up

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-05-24 11:58:15 + (+), Andrea Frittoli wrote: [...] > The only concern I have here is that the topics to be discussed by > the QA and Infra teams will be different and a shared room might > not be ideal since we would have two ongoing discussions in the > same room. The three days

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-05-24 12:10:17 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > One of the things you might notice on Mon-Tue is the "helproom" concept. > In the spirit of separating inter-project and intra-project activities, > support teams (Infra, QA, Release Management, Stable branch maintenance, > but

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Jay S Bryant
Thierry, Thank you for getting this Strawman out. I think it is helpful! I think the plan looks good. Jay On 5/24/2017 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sean McGinnis wrote: > I see Cinder is down for an XL room. Any idea of the size of the rooms > this time around? If they are going to be as spacious as ATL, I think a > L room might actually work better for us than XL. Of course I say this > not really knowing how many attendees we will end up

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: > Two questions about theme-based initiatives: > > I would like to have a discussion about the work to stop syncing > requirements and to see if we can make progress on the implementation > while we have the right people together. That seems like a topic > for Monday or

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-24 12:10:17 +0200: > Hi everyone, > > In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a > purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more > inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments > were

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Sean McGinnis
On 05/24/2017 05:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/24/2017 02:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xmOdT6uZ5XqViActr5sBOaz_mEgjKSCY7NEWcAEcT-A/pubhtml?gid=397241312=true Let me know what you think. If you're scheduled on the Wed-Fri but

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xmOdT6uZ5XqViActr5sBOaz_mEgjKSCY7NEWcAEcT-A/pubhtml?gid=397241312=true >> >> Let me know what you think. If you're scheduled on the Wed-Fri but would >> rather be scheduled on Mon-Tue

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:40 AM Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a > > purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/24/2017 12:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the

[openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-05-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments were positive. We need to solidify how the week will look like before we open up registration