Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

Excerpts from Rob C's message of 2016-11-30 18:38:53 +: > [Resending without the PTLs in CC because it got my mail stuck in the spam > filters] > > I'm struggling to find good info on when the adjusted PTL nomination cycle > starts. > > I've checked here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

It looks like your email was already replied to: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/108141.html On 30 Nov 2016, at 18:38, Rob C > wrote: [Resending without the PTLs in CC because it got my mail stuck in the spam

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

[Resending without the PTLs in CC because it got my mail stuck in the spam filters] I'm struggling to find good info on when the adjusted PTL nomination cycle starts. I've checked here: https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule. html#pike-ptls-self-nomination but it looks like the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

Rob C wrote: > I'm struggling to find good info on when the adjusted PTL nomination > cycle starts. > > I've checked here: > https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html#pike-ptls-self-nomination > but it looks like the 'elections' section was supposed to be added to > the table and wasn't.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

I'm struggling to find good info on when the adjusted PTL nomination cycle starts. I've checked here: https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html#pike-ptls-self-nomination but it looks like the 'elections' section was supposed to be added to the table and wasn't. I know from the updates

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

Doug, As predecessor PTL for Kolla, I have followed your recommendations 1-4 including this ack, although I am not sure its really necessary for me. Note, I am not sure Michal (inc0 on irc) wants me to continue as release liaison or do the job himself, so that step has not yet been taken. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

On 11/1/2016 2:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: 4. Reply to this message, off-list, so I know that you have received it. A simple “ack” is enough. Got it. :) -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [ptl][release] ocata release management communication

PTLs, As we did for the Mitaka and Newton cycles, I want to start this cycle by making sure the expectations for communications with the release team are clear to everyone so there is no confusion or miscommunication about any of the process or deadlines. This email is being sent to the