Monty Taylor writes:
> On 10/29/18 10:47 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Monty Taylor writes:
>>
>>> Heya,
>>>
>>> Tobias and I were chatting at OpenStack Days Nordic about the Public
>>> Cloud Working Group potentially taking over as custodians of the vendor
>>> profile information [0][1] we keep
On 10/29/18 10:47 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Monty Taylor writes:
Heya,
Tobias and I were chatting at OpenStack Days Nordic about the Public
Cloud Working Group potentially taking over as custodians of the vendor
profile information [0][1] we keep in openstacksdk (and previously in
os-client-co
Monty Taylor writes:
> Heya,
>
> Tobias and I were chatting at OpenStack Days Nordic about the Public
> Cloud Working Group potentially taking over as custodians of the vendor
> profile information [0][1] we keep in openstacksdk (and previously in
> os-client-config)
>
> I think this is a fine
I'm in support, mainly for quite a few reasons:
- The vendor data should/might need to be be released often. If a
provider makes a change, it'd be nice that you can pick it up without
changing everything else that sits in your system (and potentially
breaking other things)
- We can add some very
Heya,
Tobias and I were chatting at OpenStack Days Nordic about the Public
Cloud Working Group potentially taking over as custodians of the vendor
profile information [0][1] we keep in openstacksdk (and previously in
os-client-config)
I think this is a fine idea, but we've got some dancing t