Hi,
Some of our modules have stable/grizzly and stable/havana branches. Some
of them have the CI broken due to rspec issues that would require some
investigation and time if we wanted to fix it.
We would like to know who plan to backport some patches in these branches?
If nobody plans to do that
+1 from me for deprecation.
I'd also like to know or have an official policy for future deprecations,
such as when will we deprecate Icehouse?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of our modules have stable/grizzly and stable/havana branches. Some
> of them have
+1 for deprecation
--
David Moreau Simard
On 2015-06-16 11:54 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some of our modules have stable/grizzly and stable/havana branches. Some
> of them have the CI broken due to rspec issues that would require some
> investigation and time if we wanted to fix it.
>
>
Matt Fischer wrote:
+1 from me for deprecation.
I'd also like to know or have an official policy for future
deprecations, such as when will we deprecate Icehouse?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Emilien Macchi mailto:emil...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Some of our modules have stable/gri
I'd vote for stable -2. I think a number of people do an upgrade maybe
once a year. I believe CERN just upgraded to juno recently.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Richard Raseley
wrote:
> Matt Fischer wrote:
>
>> +1 from me for deprecation.
>>
>> I'd also like to know or have an official poli
