On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 06:56:55PM (-0400), Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi,
I dressed a spreadsheet with the current status of our CI [1].
You can see that we need to work on Puppet 4.0 [2] and beaker [3].
Oh! Nice, thanks Emilien :-)
Otherwise, gate-puppet-*-puppet-syntax-future is green everywhe
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 18:56 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I dressed a spreadsheet with the current status of our CI [1].
> You can see that we need to work on Puppet 4.0 [2] and beaker [3].
Would it be reasonable to add a column representing the TripleO tests as
well. Currently we only h
Emilien Macchi wrote:
I dressed a spreadsheet with the current status of our CI [1].
You can see that we need to work on Puppet4.0 [2] and beaker [3].
Otherwise, gate-puppet-*-puppet-syntax-future is green everywhere and I
don't see any reason why they should not vote in our CI process.
Also,
Hi,
I dressed a spreadsheet with the current status of our CI [1].
You can see that we need to work on Puppet 4.0 [2] and beaker [3].
Otherwise, gate-puppet-*-puppet-syntax-future is green everywhere and I
don't see any reason why they should not vote in our CI process.
Also, once we have Puppet
