intel.com>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] Do we care about pypy for clients
(broken by cryptography)
On 31 May 2017, at 5:34, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>>> W
> Just a couple things (I don't think it changes the decision made).
>
> Cryptography does at least claim to support PyPy (see
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cryptography/ trove identifiers), so
> possibly a bug on their end that should get filed?
>
> Also, our user clients should probably run
On 31 May 2017, at 5:34, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>>> We had a discussion a few months back around what to do for cryptography
>>> since pycrypto is basically dead [1]. After some
On Wed, May 31, 2017, at 07:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:47:37AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-05-31 07:34:03 -0500:
> > > On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:47:37AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-05-31 07:34:03 -0500:
> > On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am not aware of anyone using
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-05-31 07:34:03 -0500:
> On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> >> We had a discussion a few months back around what to do for cryptography
> >> since pycrypto is basically dead
On 05/31/2017 06:39 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
We had a discussion a few months back around what to do for cryptography
since pycrypto is basically dead [1]. After some discussion, at least on
the Cinder project, we decided the best
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> We had a discussion a few months back around what to do for cryptography
> since pycrypto is basically dead [1]. After some discussion, at least on
> the Cinder project, we decided the best way forward was to use the
> cryptography
We had a discussion a few months back around what to do for cryptography
since pycrypto is basically dead [1]. After some discussion, at least on
the Cinder project, we decided the best way forward was to use the
cryptography package instead, and work has been done to completely remove
pycrypto
