Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-29 Thread Andrew Lazarev
I like idea of "edp." prefix. Andrew. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Trevor McKay wrote: > So, assuming we go forward with this, the followup question is whether > or not to move "main_class" and "java_opts" for Java actions into > "edp.java.main_class" and "edp.java.java_opts" configs. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-29 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Trevor, it sounds reasonable to move main_class and java_opts to edp.java. Jon, does you mean neutron-related info for namespaces support? If yes than neutron isn't the user-side config. Thanks. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jon Maron wrote: > I imagine 'neutron' would follow suit as wel

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-29 Thread Jon Maron
I imagine ‘neutron’ would follow suit as well.. On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Trevor McKay wrote: > So, assuming we go forward with this, the followup question is whether > or not to move "main_class" and "java_opts" for Java actions into > "edp.java.main_class" and "edp.java.java_opts" configs.

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-29 Thread Trevor McKay
So, assuming we go forward with this, the followup question is whether or not to move "main_class" and "java_opts" for Java actions into "edp.java.main_class" and "edp.java.java_opts" configs. I think yes. Best, Trevor On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 09:15 -0500, Trevor McKay wrote: > On Wed, 2014-01-29

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-29 Thread Trevor McKay
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 14:35 +0400, Alexander Ignatov wrote: > Thank you for bringing this up, Trevor. > > EDP gets more diverse and it's time to change its model. > I totally agree with your proposal, but one minor comment. > Instead of "savanna." prefix in job_configs wouldn't it be better to mak

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-29 Thread Alexander Ignatov
Thank you for bringing this up, Trevor. EDP gets more diverse and it's time to change its model. I totally agree with your proposal, but one minor comment. Instead of "savanna." prefix in job_configs wouldn't it be better to make it as "edp."? I think "savanna." is too more wide word for this. An

[openstack-dev] [savanna] How to handle diverging EDP job configuration settings

2014-01-28 Thread Trevor McKay
Hello all, In our first pass at EDP, the model for job settings was very consistent across all of our job types. The execution-time settings fit into this (superset) structure: job_configs = {'configs': {}, # config settings for oozie and hadoop 'params': {}, # substitution values