Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-19 Thread Luke Hinds
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Luke Hinds > [...] > >> for non security related functions, but when it comes to government > >> compliance and running OpenStack on public clouds (and even private

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-18 Thread John Dickinson
On 18 Nov 2016, at 8:14, Dean Troyer wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Luke Hinds > [...] >>> for non security related functions, but when it comes to government >>> compliance and running OpenStack on public clouds (and even private for the >>> Telcos / NFV),

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography) > > -Original Message- > > From: Luke Hinds > [...] > >> for non security related functions, but when it comes

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-18 Thread Dean Troyer
> -Original Message- > From: Luke Hinds [...] >> for non security related functions, but when it comes to government >> compliance and running OpenStack on public clouds (and even private for the >> Telcos / NFV), not meeting FIPS will in some cases block production

[openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Luke Hinds Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: November 18, 2016 at 08:43:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)