Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] [networking-sfc] Removing required port-id from classifier

2016-10-05 Thread Tim Rozet
Igor" <igor.duarte.card...@intel.com> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, "Cathy Zhang" <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:06:02 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] [networking-sfc] Removing required port-id from classifier

2016-10-05 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
ssage- From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 6:07 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tacker] [networking-sfc] Removing

[openstack-dev] [tacker] [networking-sfc] Removing required port-id from classifier

2016-10-04 Thread Tim Rozet
Hi Cathy, I recall a while back discussing removing the required neutron port-id from the classifier. We just finished up implementing VNFFG in Tacker and are hitting this while testing. What is the plan to remove this requirement? Also, how are IETF SFC/NSH related API/plugin changes going?