On 07/05/17 11:59 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-07 09:49:41 -0400:
On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent:
>>
>> * We
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-07 09:49:41 -0400:
> On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> >On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >
> >> Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent:
> >>
> >> * We use the meeting to give the final ack
On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent:
* We use the meeting to give the final ack on some the formal-vote reviews.
* Some folks (tc members and not) use the meeting agenda
On 05/05/17 11:22 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sean McGinnis wrote:
[...]
But part of my concern to getting rid of the meeting is that I do find it
valuable. The arguments against having it are some of the same I've heard for
our in-person events. It's hard for some to travel to the PTG.
On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent:
>
> * We use the meeting to give the final ack on some the formal-vote reviews.
> * Some folks (tc members and not) use the meeting agenda to know what they
> should be
Sean McGinnis wrote:
> [...]
> But part of my concern to getting rid of the meeting is that I do find it
> valuable. The arguments against having it are some of the same I've heard for
> our in-person events. It's hard for some to travel to the PTG. There's a lot
> of active discussion at the PTG
On Thu, May 04 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Sending this out to kick off a broader discussion on these topics. Thoughts?
> Opinions? Objections?
IRC meetings are a barrier of entry for many people because it makes it
complicated to contribute as you described (and as I did a while back¹).
So
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 10:10:41AM -0700, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the last Technical Committee meeting, we discussed the idea of dropping the
> Technical Committee meeting entirely[0][1] in favor of a more asynchronous
> communication. Here's a brief summary of the problems this
Greetings,
In the last Technical Committee meeting, we discussed the idea of dropping the
Technical Committee meeting entirely[0][1] in favor of a more asynchronous
communication. Here's a brief summary of the problems this is trying to solve
(most taken from the proposal):
* It takes place a
