Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-23 Thread Thierry Carrez
Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: [...] Brain still booting this morning - 8am ftl. Thinking more clearly on this point, we could add a requirement that the software produce a functional out of the box working environment. This would easily apply to OSA and possibly even Puppet/Chef efforts. A stab

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Dan Prince
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 15:37 +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > On 3/22/16, 2:15 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: > > > > > Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > > > > > Technical Committee, > > > > > > Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 3/22/16, 2:15 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> Technical Committee, >> >> Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment >> [1]. If people don¹t like the type name, we can change it. The basic >> idea is there are a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
22, 2016 at 7:40 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment On 22 March 2016 at 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 3/22/16, 2:15 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> Technical Committee, >> >> Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment >> [1]. If people don¹t like the type name, we can change it. The basic >> idea is there are a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 22 March 2016 at 09:15, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > For OSA, we don't produce the deployment tool, only a set of playbooks. I > was thinking we might need a type:packaging tag to describe which things we > produce are just about packaging OpenStack things for usage by

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Technical Committee, Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment [1]. If people don’t like the type name, we can change it. The basic idea is there are a class of projects unrepresented by type:service and type:library which are

[openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment

2016-03-21 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Technical Committee, Please accept my proposal of a new type of project called a deployment [1]. If people don't like the type name, we can change it. The basic idea is there are a class of projects unrepresented by type:service and type:library which are deployment projects including but