Doug Hellmann wrote:
There is a patch to update the Python 3.5 goal for Kolla [1]. While
I'm glad to see the work happening, the change adds a new deliverable
to an old goal, and it isn’t clear whether we want to use that
approach for tracking goal work indefinitely. I see a few options.
1. We
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-05-07 14:06:35 +:
> On 2018-05-07 09:52:16 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> [...]
> > 3. We could do nothing to record the work related to the goal.
> [...]
>
> For situations like 557863 I think I'd prefer either the status quo
> (the kolla
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> There is a patch to update the Python 3.5 goal for Kolla [1]. While
> I'm glad to see the work happening, the change adds a new deliverable
> to an old goal, and it isn’t clear whether we want to use that
> approach for
On 2018-05-07 09:52:16 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
[...]
> 3. We could do nothing to record the work related to the goal.
[...]
For situations like 557863 I think I'd prefer either the status quo
(the kolla deliverable _was_ already listed so it could make
sense to update it in that
There is a patch to update the Python 3.5 goal for Kolla [1]. While
I'm glad to see the work happening, the change adds a new deliverable
to an old goal, and it isn’t clear whether we want to use that
approach for tracking goal work indefinitely. I see a few options.
1. We could update the