Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [nova] [octavia] [ironic] [keystone] [policy] Spec. Freeze Exception - Default Roles

2018-05-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-05-04 15:16:09 -0500: > > On 05/04/2018 02:55 PM, Harry Rybacki wrote: > > Greetings All, > > > > After a discussion in #openstack-tc[1] earlier today, the Keystone > > team is adjusting its approach in proposing default roles[2]. > > Subsequently, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [nova] [octavia] [ironic] [keystone] [policy] Spec. Freeze Exception - Default Roles

2018-05-08 Thread Lance Bragstad
This was discussed in today's meeting and it was pretty clear that we should still do this for Rocky [0]. Updating this thread to include documentation of the discussion. Thanks, Harry. [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2018/keystone.2018-05-08-16.00.log.html#l-15 On

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [nova] [octavia] [ironic] [keystone] [policy] Spec. Freeze Exception - Default Roles

2018-05-04 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 05/04/2018 02:55 PM, Harry Rybacki wrote: > Greetings All, > > After a discussion in #openstack-tc[1] earlier today, the Keystone > team is adjusting its approach in proposing default roles[2]. > Subsequently, I have ported the current default roles specification > from openstack-specs[3] to

[openstack-dev] [tc] [nova] [octavia] [ironic] [keystone] [policy] Spec. Freeze Exception - Default Roles

2018-05-04 Thread Harry Rybacki
Greetings All, After a discussion in #openstack-tc[1] earlier today, the Keystone team is adjusting its approach in proposing default roles[2]. Subsequently, I have ported the current default roles specification from openstack-specs[3] to keystone-specs[2]. The original review has been in a