> To: gordon chung
> Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer
> API
>
> On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
>
> > so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
> > (and ev
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
> On 04/10/2016 12:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> > I won't be at Barcelona, but would like to participate in the telemetry
> > sessions, and particularly this one.
> > Are there plans to enable remote participants (beyond just etherpad),
Le 2016-10-04 18:09, gordon chung a écrit :
On 04/10/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer
scaling in their templates?
Tim
pretty big. :/
The use-case itself is still supported.
Using Ceilometer alarming or Aodh alarming is t
On 04/10/2016 12:35 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
>
>> so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
>> (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature.
>
> That's debatable.
>
> Pushing events is IMHO out of sc
pi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 October 2016 17:12
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API
> we removed the API and storage containers from our Kubernetes deployment of
> Ceilometer some time ago.
> We use the collector
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
> so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
> (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature.
That's debatable.
Pushing events is IMHO out of scope of Ceilometer – it's related to
oslo.messaging notifi
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
> i think the main issue right now is, no one is maintaining the storage
> solutions (for a while now if we're talking about metric storage) but
> people are using it. many people have figured it out and bailed on the
> storage for their own solutions or
On 04/10/2016 12:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> I won't be at Barcelona, but would like to participate in the telemetry
> sessions, and particularly this one.
> Are there plans to enable remote participants (beyond just etherpad),
> i.e. hangouts or skype, or something similar?
we can try this
so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
(and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature.
On 04/10/2016 11:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
> during those last cycles, and
On 10/04/2016 11:53 AM, Hague, Darren wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
starting to wonder if it makes sen
On 04/10/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer scaling
> in their templates?
>
> Tim
pretty big. :/
i don't really have anything else to add to this answer. jd__, add it to
discussion :P
i think the main issue right now is, no o
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
> during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
> starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer
> API.
>
> As of today
> On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:36, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
>
>> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
>> during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
>> starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legac
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
>
> > Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
> > during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
> > starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilomete
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer
API.
No surprise, as I've been saying this for
Hi,
Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer
API.
As of today, it's still barely useful, unusable at large scale, and
barely mainta
16 matches
Mail list logo