On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Haïkel wrote:
I agree it won't be simple, we will have to provide those
repositories, determine how
we will gate updates, fix puppet modules, POI, etc.. and that's only a
beginning.
That's why we won't be providing raw Fedora but rather a curated
version and at some
poi
2018-02-14 22:53 GMT+01:00 Tom Barron :
> On 13/02/18 16:53 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote:
>>>
>>> Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable
>>> conjecture that downstream distributions
>>> will drop support for python 2
On 13/02/18 16:53 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote:
Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a
reasonable conjecture that downstream distributions
will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as
early as next year.
I'm not s
2018-02-14 17:05 GMT+01:00 Ben Nemec :
>
>
> On 02/13/2018 05:30 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess if RDO has chosen this path then we don't have much choice.
>>
>>
>> This makes it sound like we had a choice to begin with.
>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
> I have to admit I don't entirely understand this constraint. CentOS 7 is in
> support until 2024. I would think RHEL 7's timeline is similar or even
> longer. If Python 2 is going out of support in 2020, does that mean there
> will be no su
On 02/13/2018 10:24 PM, Haïkel wrote:
RDO has *yet* to choose a plan, and people were invited to work on the
"stabilized" repository draft [0]. If anyone has a better plan that fits all the
constraints, please share it asap.
Whatever the plan, we're launching it with the Rocky cycle.
Among the
On 02/13/2018 05:30 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
I guess if RDO has chosen this path then we don't have much choice.
This makes it sound like we had a choice to begin with.
We've already had a lot of discussions around the topic but we're
2018-02-13 23:53 GMT+01:00 Ben Nemec :
>
>
> On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote:
>>
>> Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable
>> conjecture that downstream distributions
>> will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as early as
>> next year.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
> I guess if RDO has chosen this path then we don't have much choice.
This makes it sound like we had a choice to begin with.
We've already had a lot of discussions around the topic but we're
ultimately stuck between a rock and a hard place.
We
On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote:
Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable
conjecture that downstream distributions
will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as early as
next year.
I'm not sure I agree. I suspect python 2 support wi
Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a
reasonable conjecture that downstream distributions
will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as early
as next year.
In Pike, OpenStack projects, including TripleO, added python 3 unit
tests. That effort was a go
11 matches
Mail list logo