On 2016-04-19 15:34:16 -0400 (-0400), James Slagle wrote:
> A fork would be unfortunate. What about a new repo that's just for
> the elements used heavily by infra, e.g.,
> openstack-infra-elements.
[...]
We do already have a bunch of elements in
openstack-infra/project-config, so most of the velo
Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2016-04-20 06:25:17 +1000:
> On 04/20/2016 03:25 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > It's not just about control, it's also about communication. One of
> > the most frequent refrains we hear is "what is OpenStack", and one
> > way we're trying to answer that is to pu
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, at 01:25 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On 04/20/2016 03:25 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > It's not just about control, it's also about communication. One of
> > the most frequent refrains we hear is "what is OpenStack", and one
> > way we're trying to answer that is to publicize all
On 04/20/2016 06:09 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I've seen dib updated and broken things.
I've seen dib elements updated and things broke (centos6 removal in
particular hurt.)
By the time it gets to a release, however, anything we've broken is
already baked in. Any changes in there have already
On 04/20/2016 03:25 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
It's not just about control, it's also about communication. One of
the most frequent refrains we hear is "what is OpenStack", and one
way we're trying to answer that is to publicize all of the things
we release through releases.openstack.org.
So for
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-04-19 15:41:26 +:
> > On 2016-04-19 09:22:57 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2016-04-19 12:11:35 +1000:
> > [...]
> > > > I don't expect the
Tuesday, April 19, 2016 12:34 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][releases] Remove diskimage-builder
from releases
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> DIB is an unfortunate combination of a mos
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> DIB is an unfortunate combination of a mostly stable framework and a
> large pre-written set of scripts and declarative data which is
> constantly evolving for widespread use outside the OpenStack
> ecosystem (so most of the change volume i
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> It's not just about control, it's also about communication. One of
> the most frequent refrains we hear is "what is OpenStack", and one
> way we're trying to answer that is to publicize all of the things
> we release through releases.openstac
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-04-19 15:41:26 +:
> On 2016-04-19 09:22:57 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2016-04-19 12:11:35 +1000:
> [...]
> > > I don't expect the stable release team to be involved with all this;
> > > but if we
On 2016-04-19 09:22:57 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2016-04-19 12:11:35 +1000:
[...]
> > I don't expect the stable release team to be involved with all this;
> > but if we miss windows then we're left either going to efforts getting
> > one of a handf
Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2016-04-19 12:11:35 +1000:
> Hi,
>
> diskimage-builder has fallen under the "centralised release tagging"
> mechanism [1], presumably because it is under tripleo. I'd like to
> propose that we don't do that.
Yes, we've set up all official projects to use th
Hi,
diskimage-builder has fallen under the "centralised release tagging"
mechanism [1], presumably because it is under tripleo. I'd like to
propose that we don't do that.
Firstly, dib doesn't have any branches to manage.
dib's other main function is as part of the daily CI image builds.
This m
13 matches
Mail list logo
