On 2/14/18 11:58 AM, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Brian Haley > wrote:
On 02/13/2018 05:08 PM, Armando M. wrote:
On 13 February 2018 at 14:02, Brent Eagles
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
> On 02/13/2018 05:08 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 13 February 2018 at 14:02, Brent Eagles beag...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The neutron agents are implemented in such a way
On 02/13/2018 05:08 PM, Armando M. wrote:
On 13 February 2018 at 14:02, Brent Eagles > wrote:
Hi,
The neutron agents are implemented in such a way that key
functionality is implemented in terms of haproxy, dnsmasq,
keepalived
On 13 February 2018 at 14:02, Brent Eagles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The neutron agents are implemented in such a way that key functionality is
> implemented in terms of haproxy, dnsmasq, keepalived and radvd
> configuration. The agents manage instances of these services but, by
>
Hi,
The neutron agents are implemented in such a way that key functionality is
implemented in terms of haproxy, dnsmasq, keepalived and radvd
configuration. The agents manage instances of these services but, by
design, the parent is the top-most (pid 1).
On baremetal this has the advantage that,