Hi all,
Recently I had some discussion with folks around the future strategy for
TripleO wrt upgrades, releases and branches, specifically:
- How do we support a "stable" TripleO release/branch that enables folks to
easily deploy the current stable release of OpenStack
- Related to the above, h
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:28:39PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:29:07PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Recently I had some discuss
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I had some discussion with folks around the future strategy for
> TripleO wrt upgrades, releases and branches, specifically:
>
> - How do we support a "stable" TripleO release/branch that enables folks to
> easily deploy
On 08/17/2015 09:29 PM, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I had some discussion with folks around the future strategy for
TripleO wrt upgrades, releases and branches, specifically:
- How do we support a "stable" TripleO release/branch th
On 17/08/15 22:29, James Slagle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recently I had some discussion with folks around the future strategy for
>> TripleO wrt upgrades, releases and branches, specifically:
>>
>> - How do we support a "stable" TripleO release
Steven Hardy wrote:
> The obvious answer is a stable branch for certain TripleO components, and
> in particular for t-h-t, but this has disadvantages if we take the
> OpenStack wide "no feature backports" approach - for example "upgrade
> support to liberty" could be considered a feature, and many
On 17/08/15 15:29, James Slagle wrote:
>
>I'd like propose we take a somewhat modified "release branch" approach,
>which combines many of the advantages of the stable-branch model, but
>allows for a somewhat more liberal approach to backports, where most things
>are considered valid backports pro
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:29:07PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Recently I had some discussion with folks around the future strategy for
> > TripleO wrt upgrades, releases and branches, specifically:
> >
> > - How do we suppo
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:29:07PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Recently I had some discussion with folks around the future strategy for
>> > TripleO wrt upgrades, r
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:28:39PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 03:29:07PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Recently I had some discuss
10 matches
Mail list logo