Hi All,
I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the
overcloud[1], the approach I've started with is to add ironic into the
overcloud controller in scenario004. Also to run a script on the controller
(as a NodeExtraConfigPost) that sets up a VM with vbmc that can then be
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
>I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the
> overcloud[1], the approach I've started with is to add ironic into the
> overcloud controller in scenario004. Also to run a script on the controller
> (as a N
On 1 February 2018 at 15:36, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the
>> overcloud[1], the approach I've started with is to add ironic into the
>> overcloud controller
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
[...]
> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
>>> networking stuff is different?
>>>
>>
>> I think we would need to run baremetal tests for this new featureset, see
>> existing files for examples.
>>
> Do you mean th
On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
> [...]
>
>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
networking stuff is different?
>>>
>>> I think we would need to run baremetal tests for this new feat
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>
> On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
> networking stuff is different?
>
>
On 23 February 2018 at 14:48, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>
> On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
> networking stuff is different?
>
