e: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
On 3/8/2016 12:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/8/2016 12:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Matt,
The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix the tests.
Here's why I believe that t
>>>>> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 2:00 PM
>>>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
>>>>
: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
On 3/8/2016 12:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/8/2016 12:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Matt,
The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix
: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
On 3/8/2016 12:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/8/2016 12:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Matt,
The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix the tests.
Here's why I believe that th
tests randomly
failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
On 3/8/2016 12:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/8/2016 12:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Matt,
The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix the tests.
Here's why I believe that this is the case.
In pertinent part, the back
t; and a server from mitaka, All is good.
> >>
> >> What you have here is a case where a test is generating an argument
> >> (slave_of) that the client (master, 2.1.0) no longer understands.
> >> There's nothing amiss there, except that the test needs to be fixed
See below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 1:53 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
> failing in stable bra
mann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:11 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
On 3/8/2016 10:17 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
This is a call for help on
rd to hearing your feedback on this.
Thanks,
-amrith
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:11 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
failing in stable b
dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
> failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
>
>
>
> On 3/8/2016 10:17 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > This is a call for help on resolving bug 1538506 [1] where the
> > probosc
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:11 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly
> failing in stable branches; bug 1538506
>
On 3/8/2016 10:17 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
This is a call for help on resolving bug 1538506 [1] where the proboscis
tests randomly fail on the stable branches with something like:
TypeError: create() got an unexpected keyword argument 'slave_of'
Craig Vyvial has a proposed stable/kilo change
This is a call for help on resolving bug 1538506 [1] where the proboscis
tests randomly fail on the stable branches with something like:
TypeError: create() got an unexpected keyword argument 'slave_of'
Craig Vyvial has a proposed stable/kilo change [2] but it has some
issues, at least from me
13 matches
Mail list logo