I've been thinking about this a bit, and had some ideas. Take the
following as points for thought, rather than my saying this is what we
should do.
How about each Trove participant be assigned a core mentor. This way,
each non-core person knows who they can ask for information about how
As a non-core, I would like to understand the process by which core prioritizes
Gerrit changes. I'd also like to know any specific criteria used for approval.
If such a process was transparent and followed consistently, wouldn't that
eliminate the need for Hey core, can you review change? in
Hi Mat:
Some answers, and my perspective, are inline:
Lowery, Mathew writes:
As a non-core, I would like to understand the process by which core
prioritizes Gerrit changes.
I'm not aware of any standard process used by all core reviewers to
prioritize reviewing changes in Gerrit. My
