r usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Tuesday, 9 January 2018 at 8:34
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] rules in vitrage_
function…
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ifat.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *"Yujun Zhang (ZTE)"
> *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)"
> *Date: *Tuesday, 9 January 2018 at 8:34
> *To: *"OpenStack Development M
ist (not for usage questions)"
Date: Tuesday, 9 January 2018 at 8:34
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] rules in vitrage_aggregated_state()
Forgot to paste the link to the related code:
https://git.openst
Forgot to paste the link to the related code:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/vitrage/tree/vitrage/entity_graph/mappings/datasource_info_mapper.py#n61
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:34 PM Yujun Zhang (ZTE)
wrote:
> Hi root causers
>
> I have been inspecting the code about aggregated state
Hi root causers
I have been inspecting the code about aggregated state recently and have a
question regarding the rules.
The "not" operator in the if clause confuses me. If it is not a configured
data source, how do we apply the aggregation rules? It seems this is
handled in else clause.