Yeah, I have been reviewing these, so happy to sponsor them too.
Patches have been re-approved.
Thanks,
John
On 5 September 2014 00:23, Michael Still wrote:
> So, that's your three. This exception is approved.
>
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
>> On 09/04/20
So, that's your three. This exception is approved.
Michael
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
>>> I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
>>>
On 09/04/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
>> I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
>> vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10975
On 04/09/14 14:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
>> I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
>> vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
>>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
> I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
> vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
> https://
I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/
ht
