Cinder is definitely lacking reviewing force. I remember 2 years ago
comparing with today and I can tell that patches are taking a lot longer to
get reviewed.
This link is also very useful to triage incoming patches:
https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project:^openstack/.*cinder.*
And for completeness, I'd also like to mention that there is this nice
dashboard:
http://status.openstack.org/reviews/#cinder
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
Thanks, Eric.
I'm doing stable reviews on weekly basis, new gerrit dashboard will be very
helpful for me.
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Eric Harney wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 05:16 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
On 05/11/2016 05:16 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to kindly ask you to pay a bit more attention to the following
> areas:
>
> * Specs: we don' reviews specs as well as code:(. TBH, my specs reviews
> count
> is very low too.
> * os-brick and
Hi all,
I would like to kindly ask you to pay a bit more attention to the following
areas:
- Specs: we don' reviews specs as well as code:(. TBH, my specs reviews
count is very low too.
- os-brick and python-brick-cinderclient-ext - we've got a lack of code
and review contribution