Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1 On 25.08.2016 21:08, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Aleksandr Didenko > > wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sergey Vasilenko >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Aleksandr Didenko wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sergey Vasilenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> /sv >> >> >> >> __ >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > +1 > > > /sv > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1 /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

My big +1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I'm surprised Denis was not core before. > He has been a tremendous core reviewer for the Puppet OpenStack modules. > > My vote doesn't count but I'm still encouraging this effort. Congrats > Denis, it's well

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

I'm surprised Denis was not core before. He has been a tremendous core reviewer for the Puppet OpenStack modules. My vote doesn't count but I'm still encouraging this effort. Congrats Denis, it's well deserved! On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1 -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Matthew Mosesohn wrote: > +1 Denis is excellent at reviews and spotting CI failure root causes. > I definitely support him. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Alex

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1 Denis is excellent at reviews and spotting CI failure root causes. I definitely support him. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Ahoy Fuel Cores, > > I would like to propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core. Denis is > always providing great

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

Ahoy Fuel Cores, I would like to propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core. Denis is always providing great reviews[0] and continues to help keep Fuel moving forward. He's the #3 reviewer and committer of the last 90 days[1] and 180 days[2]. Please vote with a +1/-1. Voting will close on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Need Help in adding multiple External networks in Fuel 9.0

> > eth0 : Admin ( PXE), Management (101), Storage (102), Internal (1000-1030) > eth1 : External ( Public ) > eth2 : None > > I am using *fuel 9.0* and i want to use provider network / Multiple > external networks with fuel. i had vlan networks on *eth1* as below > > *eth1 : 192.168.200.0/24

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Need Help in adding multiple External networks in Fuel 9.0

Hi All, I think this is right platform to ask my question. i will be thankful if someone can help me in below mentioned use-case. Here is my cloud setup: I have 4 Nodes: Controller Node : 1 No Compute + Ceph Node : 2 No Fuel Node : 1 No My Interfaces are as below : All 4 Nodes has *3 NIC

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Ocata design summit planning

Dear colleagues, We are two months from Ocata summit. Let's start planning topics we would like to discuss during design sessions. Here is etherpad [1]. Please put your topics under backlog section and we will disscuss later which of them will be brought out to design sessions. [1]

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Meeting for Aug - 18 is canceled

The agenda [1] for today's meeting has no items, so I'm calling it for the meeting this week. Please review your action items from last meeting and update the ML if you haven't done so already romcheg to annouunce fuel2 promotion and old fuel CLI removal on ML akscram to send ML about moving

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: Dear colleagues, We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0. Bravo! :) Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are planning

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] mcollective configuration on slaves

Currently we use /etc/nailgun-agent/nodiscover file to prevent early run of nailgun-agent (and thus its conflict with cloud-init). We put this file when we build an image [0] and then we remove this file at the late stage of system start process when cloud-init is done [1]. Anyway this does not

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Dear colleagues, We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0. Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are planning to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel CI

[openstack-dev] [fuel] mcollective configuration on slaves

Guys, Currently, at the time of the first boot Mcollective on slaves is configured by Cloud-init (host, port etc.) and by Nailgun agent when node identity is written. This happens in any order and already caused several problem which were fixed in bounds of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

Folks, It’s been several days when the entire python-fuelclient team is blocked by a broken CI job. Please make it non-voting ASAP. - romcheg > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 12:19 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Vladimir, > > Thanks you for the update on this. Is there any ETA

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

Vladimir, Thanks you for the update on this. Is there any ETA available? On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:09 PM Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > We are working on this. Will fix soon. > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

We are working on this. Will fix soon. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > If it’s not possible to fix this job during next few hours, let’s mark in > as non-voting until the bug(s) are fixed. > > > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 11:48 Roman

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

If it’s not possible to fix this job during next few hours, let’s mark in as non-voting until the bug(s) are fixed. > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 11:48 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Folks, > > Since the end of last week > master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

Folks, Since the end of last week master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client [1] blocks all patches to python-fuelclient. As logs suggest this issue is caused by the Xenial merge party. Please resolve the issue ASAP because some folks are blocked and cannot finish their jobs in

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.23)

Hi all! In the nearest future we are going to update the 'fuel-devops' framework on our CI to the version 2.9.23. It's bugfix-only version. As was written before, no new development is planned for this thread. Changes since 2.9.22: - fix *AddressPool._safe_create_network* method [1] List of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

Congratulations Vitalii! -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > The entire core team has voted for the nomination so I’m putting it to > power. Let’s all welcome Vitalii as a new core

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

The entire core team has voted for the nomination so I’m putting it to power. Let’s all welcome Vitalii as a new core reviewer. Congratulations! > 1 серп. 2016 р. о 08:55 Aleksey Kasatkin написав(ла): > > +1 > > > Aleksey Kasatkin > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:46

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Vitaly's doing a great job. +2, no doubts! > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Tatyana Leontovich > wrote: > > A huge +1 > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM,

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Meeting for today 7/28 is caneled

The meeting agenda is empty for this week's meeting is empty so I'm calling it on the meeting. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda -- -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis Fuel Community Ambassador Ceph Community

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

If "new design" is the design you've proposed in the original email, then no - we'll have to reopen the bug and then revert the change again. 2016-07-27 11:36 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dmitriev : > Hello Vitaly, > > Thank you for this answer. > The main question here is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

Hello Vitaly, Thank you for this answer. The main question here is the business logic. Do we have to use new design or don’t. With best regards, Dmitry > On 26 Jul 2016, at 17:47, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: > > Hi, Dmitry, > > Your design seems to be similar to one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

Hi, Dmitry, Your design seems to be similar to one of our attempts to fix this bug: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280737/. Though this fix was reverted, because it led to the bug with a higher priority: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1556909. So your proposed design would lead to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

Vitaly's doing a great job. +2, no doubts! On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: > A huge +1 > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Yegor Kotko wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

A huge +1 On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Yegor Kotko wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko > wrote: > >> Hi Fuelers, >> >> Vitalii has been providing great code reviews and patches for some time. >> His recent commitment to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

+1 On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Hi Fuelers, > > Vitalii has been providing great code reviews and patches for some time. > His recent commitment to help consolidating both old and new fuel clients > and his bug-squashing activities show his

[openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

Hi Fuelers, Vitalii has been providing great code reviews and patches for some time. His recent commitment to help consolidating both old and new fuel clients and his bug-squashing activities show his willingness to step up and take responsibilities within the community. He can often be found

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.22)

Hi All! Today we are going to update the 'fuel-devops' framework on our product CI to the version 2.9.22. It's the FINAL version in 2.9 thread, new active development will be produced in 3.x thread only, and 3.0.1 is released as first of it's. Changes sinse 2.9.21: * For devops: - paramiko

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Fuel meeting Canceled

Again the agenda [1] is empty again so I'm calling it on the meeting this week. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda -- -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis Fuel Community Ambassador Ceph Community __

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

Alexey, Congrats! On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Dennis Dmitriev wrote: > +1 > > > On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Alexander Kurenyshev wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vladimir Khlyunev < > vkhlyu...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Alexander Kurenyshev wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vladimir Khlyunev > > wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

+1 We need more cores anyway ;) On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:56 AM Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > +1 here > > Sergey's performance and quality of the code he submitted are impressive. > Please, keep going. > > -- > Best regards, > Oleg Gelbukh > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vladimir Khlyunev wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Artem Panchenko > > wrote: >> >>> +1 >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

+1 here Sergey's performance and quality of the code he submitted are impressive. Please, keep going. -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Artur Svechnikov wrote: > +1 > > Best regards, > Svechnikov Artur > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:10

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

+1 Best regards, Svechnikov Artur On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Ilya Kharin wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core due to his > significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. > > Best regards, > Ilya Kharin. > > [1]

[openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

Hello, I would like to nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core due to his significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. Best regards, Ilya Kharin. [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-octane/90 [2] http://stackalytics.com/?release=all=fuel-octane=marks_id=sabramov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Artem Panchenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On 15.07.16 16:25, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM,

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

Hello All! We have a very old bug about the Capacity table on the Dashboard tab of environment in Fuel: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1375750 Current design: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxi_JFs365mBNy1WT0xQT253SWc It shows the full

[openstack-dev] [fuel documentation] new cores in fuel-docs-core

Hey everyone, We've added new cores to the Fuel documentation project: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/657,members Thew new cores are: Olena Logvinova Mariia Zlatkova Over the past ~1,5 years they've contributed a lot of quality docs pieces to various openstack projects, including

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Artem Panchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 15.07.16 16:25, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Anastasia Urlapova < > aurlap...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On 15.07.16 16:25, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: +1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Anastasia Urlapova > wrote: +1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy < > asledzins...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'd like to nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa [0] and fuel-devops [1] >> core. >> >> Alexey is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 15 Jul 2016, at 16:08, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy > > wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to nominate Alexey

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

+1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy < asledzins...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa [0] and fuel-devops [1] > core. > > Alexey is doing great job improving fuel-qa and fuel-devops projects. > He's become an expert in code base in

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

Hi, I'd like to nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa [0] and fuel-devops [1] core. Alexey is doing great job improving fuel-qa and fuel-devops projects. He's become an expert in code base in very short terms so I think he deserves to be a part of fuel-qa/fuel-devops core team. Please, vote for

[openstack-dev] [fuel] IRC meeting for Jul - 14

The meeting agenda is again empty, so I'm calling the meeting canceled. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda -- -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis Fuel Community Ambassador Ceph Community __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

Bogdan, Vladimir *Regarding upgrades of Fuel Master Node and environments. * First, regarding Fuel Master Node upgrades and enablement of usage of 9.0 LCM features with older clusters. It is assumed that we test usability of Fuel Mitaka code with already deployed clusters, e.g. 8.0, 7.0 and so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.21)

Hi Bogdan, thanks for the question! On 07/12/2016 10:26 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 07/12/2016 09:24 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> Thank you for a hard work, that's a really great tool. >> >> Anyone who is interested, please note that fuel-devops, despite of the >> name, may be used outside

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][QA] Changes in requirements.txt in the fuel-qa repository

Hi all, Recently there was a change in the fuel-qa requirements [1], that can be found in patches for 6.1, 7.0, 8.0, mitaka and master [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. The goal is to split the requirements for system tests from requirements for fuel-devops, which is mostly the part of the system

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

On 07/13/2016 11:08 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > > > Few Q: > - Is the stable/mitaka the only stable branch in the scope of the > changes? > > ​Yes, this announce is only about Mitaka branch. All other stable > branches are to be treated as usual, i.e. no feature backports, bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

> > Few Q: > - Is the stable/mitaka the only stable branch in the scope of the changes? > ​Yes, this announce is only about Mitaka branch. All other stable branches are to be treated as usual, i.e. no feature backports, bug fixes only following "master first" policy, etc. > > - As the master and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

On 07/13/2016 10:17 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'd like to announce some of our plans on how we are going to > support/develop Fuel Mitaka stable branch. The plan is as follows: > > 0) We have been working hard and have fixed a lot of bugs in Mitaka > branch as for

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

Dear colleagues, I'd like to announce some of our plans on how we are going to support/develop Fuel Mitaka stable branch. The plan is as follows: 0) We have been working hard and have fixed a lot of bugs in Mitaka branch as for late. This week we are going to announce 9.0.1 release which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.21)

On 07/12/2016 09:24 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > Thank you for a hard work, that's a really great tool. > > Anyone who is interested, please note that fuel-devops, despite of the > name, may be used outside of Fuel and OpenStack as a really fast and > easy way to spin up VMs for a dev envs.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.21)

Thank you for a hard work, that's a really great tool. Anyone who is interested, please note that fuel-devops, despite of the name, may be used outside of Fuel and OpenStack as a really fast and easy way to spin up VMs for a dev envs. Almost like a Vagrant, although it gives you advanced

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.21)

Hi All, We are going to update the 'fuel-devops' framework on our product CI to the version 2.9.21. Changes since 2.9.20: * For devops: - Scripts for export and import systest environments, based on external libvirt snapshots [1] - Disable creation of nwfilters by default [2] - Get rid

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Please update your Fuel plugin's entries in DriverLog

Hi to everyone, please make sure your Fuel Plugin information in DriverLog [1] is up-to-date, specifically: - compatible OpenStack releases - CI/CD - maintainers list and their contact information. Detailed instructions on working with DriverLog are found here [2]. Thank you. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] It is impossible to queue UpdateDnsmasqTask

Hi, well, we have only one DHCP server that serves multiple clusters. Actions with those multiple clusters may affect DHCP server configuration. So queueing tasks that change DHCP server configuration seems like a reasonable way to fix the problem. So options 2 and 3 are much better than 1 or 4.

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Support of deployment history in fake Nailgun

Hello everyone, We [Fuel UI team] are working now on UI implementation of deployment history [1] and deployment graphs [2] features. For our development process and covering the features by functional tests, it is critical to extend fake Nailgun with emulation of a real deployment execution [3].

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting for July 7

There is no agenda on the meeting again this week so I am calling it canceled. Thanks -- -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis Fuel Community Ambassador Ceph Community __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to install fuel master

I believe it is a problem root. We put kickstart file as a kernel parameter and custom usb creators sometimes do not take it to consideration. Use plain diskdump for copy ISO onto usb stick and all should work properly in this case. You can find more details in official documentation for Fuel 8.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to install fuel master

Hi guys, I'm using Fuel-8.0 iso, I used "Lili USB Creator" to write ISO to the USB. (I tried this process for ubuntu-server.iso and it worked correctly). Regards, On 7 July 2016 at 09:54, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > Hi guys, > > could you tell which way you used to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] It is impossible to queue UpdateDnsmasqTask

Continuing speaking to myself :) Option 4 implies that we generate puppet manifest with a set of admin networks instead of writing it into hiera. So, we get a two step task which, first, generates manifest with unique name and, second, calls puppet to apply it. However, theres still a problem

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to install fuel master

Hi guys, could you tell which way you used to write ISO to the USB stick? On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jack Morgan wrote: > I'm pretty sure this is a USB stick install as I've seen the same failure > on Fuel-8.0. Basically, the installer is not able to find the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to install fuel master

I'm pretty sure this is a USB stick install as I've seen the same failure on Fuel-8.0. Basically, the installer is not able to find the mounted drive to run the kickstart file. Duel layer DVD media or a virtual Fuel master are the only ways I've gotten Fuel-8.0 to install. On 07/05/2016 05:22

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] It is impossible to queue UpdateDnsmasqTask

Bulat is suggesting to move with 4. He suggest to merge all actions of UpdateDnsmasqTask into one puppet task. There are three actions: syncing admin network list to heira, dhcp ranges update and cobbler sync. The problem I see with this approach is that current implementation does not suppose

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to install fuel master

Hi, Alioune Let's start with the most basic steps. Which Fuel are you using? And how do you install the node? Do you use USB stick or DVD or some IPMI virtual media? From what I see here it pretty much looks like, that this media is not inserted into the host. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:11 PM,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to install fuel master

Hi all, I'm trying to install fuel master using [1] on phycal server but the installation process fails and switches to a dracut console with the following error: dracut-initqueue[595] floppy0: no floppy controllers found dracut-initqueue[595] Warning: failed to fetck kickstart from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] - Nominate Maksim Malchuk to Fuel Library Core

Hi All, I'm very appreciate being a part of the Fuel project as core reviewers team! Thank you all for nomination and for +1s! On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: > Hi, > > Please welcome Maksim as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team! > > --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] - Nominate Maksim Malchuk to Fuel Library Core

Hi, Please welcome Maksim as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team! -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Adam Heczko wrote: > Although I'm not Fuel core, +1 from me to Maksim. Maksim is not only > excellent

[openstack-dev] [fuel][nailgun-agent] Announcement of massive changes in fuel-nailgun-agent

Greetings! Today we did a big change which might be invasive. We replaced ohai with facter in fuel-nailgun-agent [1]. There were a couple reasons why we did that: 1. Fuel project uses facter very intensively. However, ohai and facter have similar purpose and functionality. We were lack of some

Re: [openstack-dev] [FUEL]Network verification failed.

Hi I guess, this doc[1] will be more useful - since Samer use fuel 8.0 [1] https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2435 On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Yuki Nishiwaki wrote: > Hello Samer > > Did you read this reference (https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2036) > ?

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][QA] fuel-devops bridge and interface names

Hi to all, This message is related to upcoming changes in fuel-devops project. Race condition issue was found in scenario where multiple environments are being created at the same time. Networks or node interfaces recive the same name in different environmens and this leads to error. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Ci] New 'fuel-nailgun' gate job

Hi to all, please be informed that we've enabled voting on mentioned Jenkins jobs For any additional questions please use our #fuel-infra IRC channel On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Dmitry Kaiharodsev < dkaiharod...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi to all, > > please be informed that starting from

Re: [openstack-dev] [FUEL]Network verification failed.

Hello Samer Did you read this reference (https://community.mellanox.com/docs/DOC-2036) ? If you didn’t read it yet, this may be helpful to you. By the way, "Figure 1” which is attached is very cool chart. What the tool did you use to write this figure ?? Yuki Nishiwaki > 2016/06/30 21:01、Samer

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting 6/30 Cancled

Nothing is on the agenda this week, so I'm calling to cancel the meeting. If you have anything to discuss. Please come chat in #fuel or add it to the agenda to discuss next week. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda -- -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis Fuel Community

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation of fuel-mirror tool

Please review this patch [1]. It is to remove the code from master branch. We still need test jobs for stable branches. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/335868/ Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Fuel-mirror python

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecate fuel-upgrade repository

Yet another patch [1] that makes fuel-upgrade read only. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/335841/ Vladimir Kozhukalov On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > This is yet another related patch [1], that removes the code from master > branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecate fuel-upgrade repository

This is yet another related patch [1], that removes the code from master branch and adds retirement warning. Review is welcome. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334949/ Vladimir Kozhukalov On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Ilya Kharin wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecate fuel-upgrade repository

Hi Vladimir, This change is reasonable because the fuel-upgrade repository is not supported since the 8.0 release due to the fact that upgrade activities were consolidated in the fuel-octane repository. Also, as I know upgrade tarballs are no longer supported for the old releases (less or equal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Fuel Plugin Builder 4.1.0 released!

ack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Fuel Plugin Builder 4.1.0 released! Hey Fuelers, I'm glad to announce that FPB (fuel plugin builder) v4.1.0 has been released on PyPI [1]. It's mostly a maintenance release without new features. Here's a changelog highlights: * `tasks.ya

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Fuel Plugin Builder 4.1.0 released!

Hi, Great news, thanks! Regards, Michal > On 29 Jun 2016, at 14:28, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > > Hey Fuelers, > > I'm glad to announce that FPB (fuel plugin builder) v4.1.0 has been > released on PyPI [1]. > > It's mostly a maintenance release without new features.

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Fuel Plugin Builder 4.1.0 released!

Hey Fuelers, I'm glad to announce that FPB (fuel plugin builder) v4.1.0 has been released on PyPI [1]. It's mostly a maintenance release without new features. Here's a changelog highlights: * `tasks.yaml` is now optional for package version "4.0.0" [2] * Fuel Mitaka (9.0) is supported by

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Transition of SDK to docs.openstack.org

Hi to everyone, please be informed that Fuel Plugin SDK is being migrated to docs.openstack.org to deliver a better dev. experience and versioning. the current version placed here [1] features the very initial revision of the SDK, with no specifics of the wiki page content [2]. *REQUEST:* if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Replace OSTF with Rally

Boris, can You take a look on HA scenarios [0] to give a quick feedback on how it should be implemented with Rally in right way? Plugins/templates/how yaml should look like. To make correct comparison of ostf and rally-based version. Thanks! [0] http://paste.openstack.org/show/523983/ On Tue,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to build the bootstrap image

1. Show the logfile to see the bootstrap process is finished without any errors. 2. It depends on the Fuel version, http://10.20.0.2/cobbler/boot in some cases can't be seen through the web browser. 3. You shouldn't do anything only reboot the slave node. If fuel-bootstrap executed correctly -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to build the bootstrap image

Maksim, The bootstrap process woks fine without error but the slave can boot from network. I think that the issue is due TFTP process, it tries to reach http://10.20.0.2/cobbler/boot, I used my web browser but there is not directory named boot in cobbler folder. Should the bootstrap create this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecate fuel-upgrade repository

This patch [1] is a part of project retirement procedure [2]. Review is welcome. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/335085/ [2] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project Vladimir Kozhukalov On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to build the bootstrap image

You can start build command with debug options enabled for example and copy/paste output: > > fuel-bootstrap --verbose --debug build --activate > Very bad idea to remove logfile, it's better to empty it not remove. If you don't have the logfile, so recreate it with command: > touch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to build the bootstrap image

I've removed /var/log/fuel-bootstrap-image-build.log, created new bootstrap ubuntu again after setting proxy parameters and reboot. After the there is no /var/log/fuel-bootstrap-image-build.log create from the new bootstrap but slave doesn't boot correctly. Is there another way to detect slave

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to build the bootstrap image

You have an issue with connectivity from the Fuel master node to http://archive.ubuntu.com from the log: > Command: debootstrap --include=ca-certificates,apt-transport-https --verbose > --no-check-gpg --arch=amd64 trusty /tmp/tmp1K2haC.fuel-agent-image > http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu > Exit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Failed to build the bootstrap image

Hi all, I tried to create ubuntu bootstrap using [0] but the slave can still not booting. You can find the bootstrap log following [1]. Noticed that I've deleted the depot [2] from fuelmenu because it generated an error "URL for repository mos is not accessible". Regards, [0] fuel-bootstrap

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] - Nominate Maksim Malchuk to Fuel Library Core

Although I'm not Fuel core, +1 from me to Maksim. Maksim is not only excellent engineer but also very friendly and helpful folk. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Georgy Kibardin wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Kyrylo Galanov >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >