I had the labels wrong - here's a slightly better link - http://bit.ly/1gdxYeg
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Looks like we may be a bit more stable now?
>
> Short URL: http://bit.ly/18qq4q2
>
> Long URL :
> http://graphite.openstack.org/graphlot/?from=-120hou
Joe,
Looks like we may be a bit more stable now?
Short URL: http://bit.ly/18qq4q2
Long URL :
http://graphite.openstack.org/graphlot/?from=-120hour&until=-0hour&target=color(alias(movingAverage(asPercent(stats.zuul.pipeline.gate.job.gate-tempest-dsvm-full.SUCCESS,sum(stats.zuul.pipeline.gate.job
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 7:22:23 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
TL;DR: Gate is failing 23% of the time due to bugs in nova, neutron
and tempest. We need help fixing these bugs.
Hi All,
Before going any further we have a bug that is affecting gate and
stable, so its getting top priority here. e
TL;DR: Gate is failing 23% of the time due to bugs in nova, neutron and
tempest. We need help fixing these bugs.
Hi All,
Before going any further we have a bug that is affecting gate and stable,
so its getting top priority here. elastic-recheck currently doesn't track
unit tests because we don't
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> 2013/11/20 Joe Gordon :
>>>
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the
Hi Clark,
2013/11/21 Clark Boylan :
>
> Joe seemed to be on the same track with
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:57578,n,z
> but went far enough to revert the change that introduced that test. A
> couple people were going to keep hitting
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon :
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> 2013/11/20 Joe Gordon :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
>> past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open bugs (without pending
>> patches, and many recent hits)
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon :
> Hi All,
>
> As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
> past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open bugs (without pending
> patches, and many recent hits) that we are hitting. Gate won't be stable,
> and it will be hard t
We settled on 1251920.
https://review.openstack.org/57509 is the fix for that bug.
Note that Oslo was fixed on Jun 28th, nova hasn't synced since then.
If we were using oslo as a library we would have had the fix as soon
as olso did a release.
These are the references to strong_store - and thus
Which of these bugs would be appropriate to use for the fix to
strong_store - it affects lockutils and rpc, both of which are going
to create havoc :)
-Rob
On 21 November 2013 07:19, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> I've noticed that
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2
I'm putting up a patch now.
On 21 November 2013 07:19, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> I've noticed that
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2a90594ea0502ac5
> stores the network client in local.strong_store which is a reference to
> corolocal.local (the class, not the i
I've noticed that
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/85332012dede96fa6729026c2a90594ea0502ac5stores
the network client in local.strong_store which is a reference to
corolocal.local (the class, not the instance).
In Russell's example instead the code accesses local.store which is an
instance
On 11/20/2013 12:21 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances
> are the actual coroutine local storage.
But I don't think his example is what is being used.
Here is an example using the openstack.common.local module, which is
what nova uses f
Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances are
the actual coroutine local storage.
Alex
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
> storage. Please check out this snippe
Hey all,
I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
storage. Please check out this snippet [1].
This is how we use eventlet TLS in Nova and common Oslo code [2]. This
could explain how [3] actually breaks TripleO devtest story and our
gates.
Am I right? Or I am missing s
On 20/11/13 14:21, Anita Kuno wrote:
> Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can
> address these bugs.
>
> We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448.
>
> We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at
> Monday's
Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can
address these bugs.
We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448.
We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at
Monday's Neutron team meeting and am trying to shop it aroun
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open bugs (without
pending patches, and many recent hits) that we are hitting. Gate won't be
stable, and it will be hard to get your code merged, until we fix these
b
19 matches
Mail list logo
