On 2014-02-21 14:40:07 + (+), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
If I was to prioritize things given limited resources, I'd suggest that
we should be validating that OpenStack has not broken its own code as the
top priority. So testing lowest version would rank above testing highest
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/21/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:31 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
gate on the highest version
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter if it isn't tested, it's
probably broken, however I also think we need to be realistic about the
fact that if you did out the permutations of dependencies and config
options, we'd have as many
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31:06AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
gate on the highest
On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter if it isn't tested, it's
probably broken, however I also think we need to be realistic about the
fact that if you did out the permutations of
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter if it isn't tested, it's
probably broken, however I also think we need to be
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:31:06AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
gate on the highest
On 02/21/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter if it isn't tested, it's
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote on 02/20/2014 02:45:03 PM:
...
That being said, we also need to be a little bit careful about taking
such a hard line about supported vs. not based on only what's in the
gate. Because if we did the following things would be listed as
unsupported (in increasing
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Ah, so the only distro regularly tested is Ubuntu 12.04?
Within the OpenStack Infrastructure Team -managed environment, generally
yes (with the addition of CentOS 6 for Py26 as noted in your quote below).
However, that
Hi All,
I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
gate on the highest version that passes our requirements. While we all
agree that having
On 02/20/2014 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi All,
I discussion recently came up inside of nova about what it means
supported version for a dependency means. in libvirt we gate on the
minimal version that we support but for all python dependencies we
gate on the highest version that passes
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:03 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter if it isn't tested, it's
probably broken, however I also think we need to be realistic about
the fact that if you did out the permutations of dependencies and
config options, we'd have
On 02/20/2014 05:50 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:45:03 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So I'm one of the first people to utter if it isn't tested, it's
probably broken, however I also think we need to be realistic about
the fact that if you did out the
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:06:25 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Honestly, I think our experience in even doing a homogenous gate
means I think we should let the distros come in with 3rd party
testing on those results. Because we don't really have the bw, in
either people or machines, to
But I do think running a job with lowest version may still help a developer
realize that a feature in the latest library is not available in an older
supported version. The person can then bump up the library's min version in the
requirements. Today, it;s not possible to find this out until
On 02/20/2014 06:30 PM, Sabari Murugesan wrote:
But I do think running a job with lowest version may still help a
developer realize that a feature in the latest library is not available
in an older supported version. The person can then bump up the library's
min version in the requirements.
18 matches
Mail list logo
