Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Rudra 2013/10/8 Rudra Rugge : > Hi Nachi, > > Please see inline: > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote: > >> Hi Rudra >> >> Thanks! >> >> Some questions and comments >> >> - name and fq_name >> How we use name and fq_name ? >> IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name. >> > [Rudr

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Nachi, Please see inline: On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote: > Hi Rudra > > Thanks! > > Some questions and comments > > - name and fq_name > How we use name and fq_name ? > IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name. > [Rudra] 'name' meets all the current Neutron models like

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Rudra Thanks! Some questions and comments - name and fq_name How we use name and fq_name ? IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name. - "src_ports": ["80-80"], For API consistency, we should use similar way of the security groups http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Nachi, I have split the spec for policy and VPN wiki served as a good reference point. Please review and provide comments: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-policy-extensions-for-neutron Thanks, Rudra On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: > 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge : >> Hi Nac

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge : > Hi Nachi, > > Inline response > > On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote: > >>Hi Rudra >> >>inline responded >> >>2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge : >>> Hi Nachi, >>> >>> Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline: >>> >>> On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote: >>> Hi Ru

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Nachi, Inline response On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote: >Hi Rudra > >inline responded > >2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge : >> Hi Nachi, >> >> Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline: >> >> On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote: >> >>>Hi Rudra >>> >>>Two comment from me >>> >>>(1) IPA

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Rudra inline responded 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge : > Hi Nachi, > > Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline: > > On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote: > >>Hi Rudra >> >>Two comment from me >> >>(1) IPAM and Network policy extension looks like independent extension. >>so IPAM part and Net

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Nachi, Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline: On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote: >Hi Rudra > >Two comment from me > >(1) IPAM and Network policy extension looks like independent extension. >so IPAM part and Network policy should be divided for two blueprints. [Rudra] I agree

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi Rudra Two comment from me (1) IPAM and Network policy extension looks like independent extension. so IPAM part and Network policy should be divided for two blueprints. (2) The team IPAM is too general word. IMO we should use more specific word. How about SubnetGroup? (3) Network Policy Resou

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi All, The link in the email was incorrect. Please follow the following link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron Thanks, Rudra On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Rudra Rugge mailto:rru...@juniper.net>> wrote: Hi All, A blueprint has been registered t

[openstack-dev] Blueprint for IPAM and Policy extensions in Neutron

Hi All, A blueprint has been registered to add IPAM and Policy extensions to Neutron. Please review the blueprint and the attached specification. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/juniper-contrail-ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron All comments are welcome. Thanks, Rudra __