Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Jay Pipes
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:59 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 01/22/2014 05:52 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-22 13:43:41 -0800: > >> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >>> > >>> == > >>> Executive Summary > >>> =

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread James E. Blair
Robert Collins writes: > On 23 January 2014 09:39, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> Changes coming in gate structure >> > >> Svelt Gate >> == >> >> The gate jobs will be trimmed down immensely. Nothing project >> specific, so pep8

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Robert Collins
On 23 January 2014 09:39, Sean Dague wrote: > > Changes coming in gate structure > > Svelt Gate > == > > The gate jobs will be trimmed down immensely. Nothing project > specific, so pep8 / unit tests all ripped out, no func

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/22/2014 05:52 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-22 13:43:41 -0800: >> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >>> >>> == >>> Executive Summary >>> == >>> To summarize, the effects of these change

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-22 13:43:41 -0800: > On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > > > == > > Executive Summary > > == > > To summarize, the effects of these changes will be: > > > > - 1) Decrease the impact

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/22/2014 05:24 PM, Peter Portante wrote: > Can you consider issuing the check job before forwarding to the gate if > the current patch set is not already (re)based against master? That > way, if it is, and there was a successful check job, even if it was days > old, a new one would not be nee

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/22/2014 04:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> == >> Executive Summary >> == >> To summarize, the effects of these changes will be: >> >> - 1) Decrease the impact of failures resetting the entir

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Peter Portante
Can you consider issuing the check job before forwarding to the gate if the current patch set is not already (re)based against master? That way, if it is, and there was a successful check job, even if it was days old, a new one would not be needed? Perhaps?

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Anita Kuno
On 01/22/2014 04:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> == >> Executive Summary >> == >> To summarize, the effects of these changes will be: >> >> - 1) Decrease the impact of failures resetting the entir

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Jay Pipes
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > == > Executive Summary > == > To summarize, the effects of these changes will be: > > - 1) Decrease the impact of failures resetting the entire gate queue >by doing the heavy testing in t

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > > Changes coming in gate structure > > > Unless you've been living under a rock, on the moon, around Saturn, > you'll have noticed that the gate has been quite backed up the last

[openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread Sean Dague
Changes coming in gate structure Unless you've been living under a rock, on the moon, around Saturn, you'll have noticed that the gate has been quite backed up the last 2 weeks. Every time we get towards a milestone this gets measur