On 04/09/2016 06:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person
> the mailing list is a violation of our community standards.
Monty,
I don't take it lightly either. Please think twice about who's behavior
is inappropriate.
Because I've seen
This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person
the mailing list is a violation of our community standards.
I'm going to respond to a different email in the chain because Anne asks
a question. However, this approach to this problem is categorically
unacceptable in
On Apr 9, 2016 11:51 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is
> the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits
> as per the other distros. I can't remember whether you already tried a
> version
As I've commented on Matthew's patch to the guide, you may just ask apt
not to ask questions provided by debconf, by prepending
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive to it. Of course you will need to add
more options in case of an upgrade if you want to get rid of all the
questions, like adding
Tom,
Would you elaborate more?
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Fifield" <t...@openstack.org>
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 6:20:31 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove
Debian from t
On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I still don't have any idea what's wrong with the
Debian guide.
The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is
the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits
as per the other distros. I can't remember
On 04/08/2016 11:57 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> Sorry it didn't come across as a joke, but that's what the '/s' was for.
Maybe I'm getting old, but that's the first time I read that '/s' means
joke. Does it stand for "" ?
> I will be at summit in Austin at a bunch of the cross project stuff
>
On 04/09/2016 02:05 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> I have another idea for a way forward that doesn't require consensus
> across teams. Now that we have the governance in place for debian
> packaging, let's move the debian install guide to a new repo that can go
> under the packaging project, and you
On 09/04/16 10:05, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Okay. I'll try to propose an idea.
>
> In the Mitaka install spec review, [1] I asked if the drama was worth the
> extra effort to remove. Personally I don't believe so, having refereed this
> discussion for years now.
>
> I think you're both reasonable
Okay. I'll try to propose an idea.
In the Mitaka install spec review, [1] I asked if the drama was worth the
extra effort to remove. Personally I don't believe so, having refereed this
discussion for years now.
I think you're both reasonable people and do believe in OpenStack. You both
want it
On 04/08/2016 03:16 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 07:47 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 04/08/2016 11:47 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Another thing is that the Debian packages are the only ones available
>>> for many services, as Canonical doesn't work on them (these packages are
>>>
On 04/08/2016 07:47 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 11:47 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Another thing is that the Debian packages are the only ones available
>> for many services, as Canonical doesn't work on them (these packages are
>> just sync from Debian, at best). So we'd be
On 04/08/2016 11:47 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Another thing is that the Debian packages are the only ones available
> for many services, as Canonical doesn't work on them (these packages are
> just sync from Debian, at best). So we'd be effectively removing the
> only OS where it can be
I forgot...
I'd also like to point out that I can fix any bug open tagged for
Debian, if someone opens it and if it is *actionable* (ie: not the way
that Matthew adopted when he reported bugs about 2 years ago).
So far, I haven't been pointed at any bug opened. Neither I've been
involved in the
I don't do ab-dominem pointing fingers. I believe this is normally
detrimental to the project. However, I don't have any choice in this
case. Matthew is consistently attempting to remove the Debian support
from the install-guide. He's doing it again:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/302934/
And
15 matches
Mail list logo