On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 17:24 +, Hayes, Graham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Designate would like to apply for incubation status in OpenStack.
>
> Our application is here:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Designate/Incubation_Application
>
> As part of our application we would like to apply for a ne
Several of the TC requested we have an openstack-infra managed DevStack
gate enabled before they would cast their vote - I'm happy to say, we've
got it :)
With the merge of [1], Designate now has voting devstack /
requirements / docs jobs. An example of the DevStack run is at [2].
"Vote Designate
Zane Bitter wrote:
> I think the problem is that we still have elements of the 'project'
> terminology around from the bad old days of the pointless
> core/core-but-don't-call-it-core/library/gating/supporting project
> taxonomy, where project == repository. The result is that every time a
> new pr
On 29/05/14 05:26, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
I honestly just think we might want to also use it as a time to rethink
our program concept. Because all our programs that include projects that
are part of the integrated release are 1 big source tree, and maybe a
couple of little trees
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 08:00 +0930, Michael Davies wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
> >
> > I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
> > suspicious of the programs for projects model if every n
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 11:26 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Back to the topic, the tension here is because DNS is seen as a
> "network" thing and therefore it sounds like it makes sense under
> "Networking". But "programs" are not categories or themes. They are
> teams aligned on a mission statement
On 05/29/2014 05:26 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
>> I honestly just think we might want to also use it as a time to rethink
>> our program concept. Because all our programs that include projects that
>> are part of the integrated release are 1 big source tree, and maybe a
>> couple
Sean Dague wrote:
> I honestly just think we might want to also use it as a time to rethink
> our program concept. Because all our programs that include projects that
> are part of the integrated release are 1 big source tree, and maybe a
> couple of little trees that orbit it (client and now specs
On 05/28/2014 07:11 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Sean Dague writes:
>
>> I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
>>
>> I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
>> suspicious of the programs for projects model if every new project
>> incubating in seems to need a
Sean Dague writes:
> I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
>
> I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
> suspicious of the programs for projects model if every new project
> incubating in seems to need a new program. Which isn't really a
> reflection on desig
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
>
> I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
> suspicious of the programs for projects model if every new project
> incubating in seems to need a new program. Which isn't
That is what I was not sure about, if they are currently one in the same.
Thanks for the link.
Carl
On May 28, 2014 2:47 PM, "Hayes, Graham" wrote:
> Sorry - not sure what happened there - as I was saying:
>
> The "Networking Program" is Neutron.
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs
>
>
Sorry - not sure what happened there - as I was saying:
The "Networking Program" is Neutron.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs
Graham
On 28/05/2014 21:29, "Hayes, Graham" wrote:
>___
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev@lists.openst
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1
This makes sense except that I'm not sure what the "Network Program"
is. Is there already such a thing formally?
Carl
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
>
> I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
>
> I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
> suspicious of the programs for projects model if every new project
> incubating in seems to need a new program. Which isn't
On 28/05/14 14:52, Sean Dague wrote:
I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
suspicious of the programs for projects model if every new project
incubating in seems to need a new program. Which isn't really a
reflection o
I would agree this doesn't make sense in Neutron.
I do wonder if it makes sense in the Network program. I'm getting
suspicious of the programs for projects model if every new project
incubating in seems to need a new program. Which isn't really a
reflection on designate, but possibly on our progra
Does this make sense in Neutron? In my opinion it doesn't.
DNSaaS is external to Neutron and is independent. It serves DNS
requests that can come from the internet just as well as they can come
from VMs in the cloud (but through the network external to the cloud).
It can serve IPs for cloud res
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 17:42 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Hayes, Graham
> wrote:
>
> * You mention nova's dns capabilities as not being adequate one of the
> incubation requirements is:
> Project should not inadvertently duplicate functionality present in other
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Designate would like to apply for incubation status in OpenStack.
> Our application is here:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Designate/Incubation_Application
Based on
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tr
Hi all,
Designate would like to apply for incubation status in OpenStack.
Our application is here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Designate/Incubation_Application
As part of our application we would like to apply for a new program. Our
application for the program is here:
https://wiki.opens
22 matches
Mail list logo
