This post contains the current working draft of the JavaScript roadmap
which myself and Beth Elwell will be working on in Newton. It’s a big list,
and we need help - Overall themes for this cycle are Consistency,
Interoperability, and engaging with the JavaScript community at large. Our
end goal is
On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
[...]
> New: js-openstacklib
>
> This new project will be incubated as a single, gate-tested JavaScript
> API client library for the OpenStack API’s. Its audience is software
> engineers who wish to build their own user interface using modern
> javascr
On 04/21/2016 10:05 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
[...]
New: js-openstacklib
This new project will be incubated as a single, gate-tested JavaScript
API client library for the OpenStack API’s. Its audience is software
engineers who wish to build their ow
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:10 AM Hayes, Graham wrote:
> On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
>
> python-openstackclient does require the creation of a new repo for each
> project (unless you are one of the chosen few).
>
> Does this mean you will accept all projects to the library, or ju
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:28 AM Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 10:05 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
> > On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> >> used piecemeal, however trying to maintain code consistency across
> >> multiple different projects is a hard lesson that others have already
On 04/21/2016 10:32 AM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:10 AM Hayes, Graham mailto:graham.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote:
On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
python-openstackclient does require the creation of a new repo for each
project (unless you are one of
On 04/21/2016 10:35 AM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:28 AM Monty Taylor mailto:mord...@inaugust.com>> wrote:
On 04/21/2016 10:05 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
> On 21/04/2016 15:39, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
>> used piecemeal, however trying to maintain code con
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM Monty Taylor wrote:
> Neat! Maybe let's find a time at the summit to sit down and look through
> things. I'm guessing that adding a second language consumer to the
> config will raise a ton of useful questions around documentation, data
> format, etc - but those w
Hi,
I have a question on js-openstacklib. If it is intended for browsers, there
will be lots of issues with cross-domain security policy, browser cannot
just go to any REST resource it wants. There is either some server-side
proxy required or cooperation of the all the REST services we want to tal
Hello there, Anton-
In Mitaka, most of OpenStack's services have landed CORS support. While
it's not yet "Automagic" (i.e. it still requires some manual
configuration), we no longer have to rely on any server component to render
a user interface.
The big outstanding things we need to do for CORS
Hi,
If I may bring some insights from the distro's viewpoint...
On 04/21/2016 04:35 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> New: Xenial Build Nodes
>
> As of two weeks ago, OpenStack’s Infrastructure is running a version of
> Node.js and npm more recent than what is available on Trusty LTS.
> Ultimately
Responses inline:
On 04/21/2016 04:35 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> > New: Xenial Build Nodes
> >
> > As of two weeks ago, OpenStack’s Infrastructure is running a version of
> > Node.js and npm more recent than what is available on Trusty LTS.
>
Update: We're now on xenial. Yay LTS!
> > Ultim
On 2016-05-12 16:27:43 + (+), Michael Krotscheck wrote:
[...]
> Has anyone agreed to do the work to include debian nodes in infra?
> I know we've got Centos7 and Fedora23 now, adding Debian doesn't
> seem like a huge stretch.
We have "debian-jessie" images and workers in Nodepool already.
On 05/12/2016 06:27 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> Responses inline:
>
> On 04/21/2016 04:35 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> > New: Xenial Build Nodes
> >
> > As of two weeks ago, OpenStack’s Infrastructure is running a
> version of
> > Node.js and npm more recent than wha
14 matches
Mail list logo
