Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-27 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-27 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Brant

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-26 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: ... Part of the challenge is turning off DEBUG is currently embedded in code in oslo log, which makes it kind of awkward to set sane log levels for

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-26 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Here is some preliminary views (it currently ignores the ceilometer logs, I haven't had a chance to dive in there yet). It actually looks like a huge

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-26 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.comwrote: On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Here is some preliminary views (it currently ignores the ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-26 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: ... Part of the challenge is turning off DEBUG is currently embedded

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-25 Thread Brant Knudson
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: ... Part of the challenge is turning off DEBUG is currently embedded in code in oslo log, which makes it kind of awkward to set sane log levels for included libraries because it requires an oslo round trip with code to all the

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-24 Thread Sean Dague
Here is some preliminary views (it currently ignores the ceilometer logs, I haven't had a chance to dive in there yet). It actually looks like a huge part of the issue is olso.messaging, the bulk of screen-n-cond is oslo.messaging debug errors. It seems that in debug mode oslo.messaging is

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Here is some preliminary views (it currently ignores the ceilometer logs, I haven't had a chance to dive in there yet). It actually looks like a huge part of the issue is olso.messaging, the bulk of screen-n-cond is

Re: [openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Here is some preliminary views (it currently ignores the ceilometer logs, I haven't had a chance to dive in there yet). It actually looks like a huge

[openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-21 Thread Clark Boylan
Hello everyone, Back at the Portland summit the Infra team committed to archiving six months of test logs for Openstack. Since then we have managed to do just that. However, more recently we have seen the growth rate on those logs continue to grow beyond what is a currently sustainable level.