Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-16 Thread Henry
Sent from my iPad On 2014-12-16, at 下午2:54, "Armando M." wrote: > > > Good questions. I'm also looking for the linux bridge MD, SRIOV MD... > Who will be responsible for these drivers? > > Excellent question. In my opinion, 'technology' specific but not vendor > specific MD (like SRIOV) sh

Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-15 Thread Armando M.
> > > > Good questions. I'm also looking for the linux bridge MD, SRIOV MD... > Who will be responsible for these drivers? > > Excellent question. In my opinion, 'technology' specific but not vendor > specific MD (like SRIOV) should not be maintained by specific vendor. It > should be accessible fo

Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-15 Thread Armando M.
On 15 December 2014 at 09:53, Neil Jerram wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the approval for Neutron vendor code decomposition > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134680/), I just wanted to comment > that it appears to work fine to have an ML2 mechanism driver _entirely_ > out of tree, so long as t

Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-15 Thread trinath.soman...@freescale.com
[mailto:ire...@mellanox.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:00 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: henry4...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change -Original Message- From: henry hly [mailto

Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-15 Thread Irena Berezovsky
-Original Message- From: henry hly [mailto:] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:12 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Neil

Re: [openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-15 Thread henry hly
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the approval for Neutron vendor code decomposition > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134680/), I just wanted to comment > that it appears to work fine to have an ML2 mechanism driver _entirely_ > out of tree, so long as

[openstack-dev] Minimal ML2 mechanism driver after Neutron decomposition change

2014-12-15 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi all, Following the approval for Neutron vendor code decomposition (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134680/), I just wanted to comment that it appears to work fine to have an ML2 mechanism driver _entirely_ out of tree, so long as the vendor repository that provides the ML2 mechanism driver doe