LOL Tom :)
-- Dims
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 14/01/16 15:22, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
>>> thread :)
>>>
>>> There appears to
On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote:
So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
thread :)
There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the
announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change to posted
to "-dev + batched inside the
So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
thread :)
There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the
announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change to posted
to "-dev + batched inside the weekly -dev digest from thingee" as
On 14/01/16 15:22, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-01-14 08:13, Tom Fifield wrote:
So, I'm prompted by another 20 oslo release emails to dredge up this
thread :)
There appears to be broad consensus that those shouldn't be going to the
announce list ... what do we need to do to get that to change
... and back to this thread after a few weeks :)
The conclusions I saw were:
* Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev"
* Service project releases announcements are good
* Client library release announcements good
* Security announcements are good
* Internal library
On 14/12/15 19:33, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tom Fifield wrote:
... and back to this thread after a few weeks :)
The conclusions I saw were:
* Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev"
* Service project releases announcements are good
* Client library release announcements good
*
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 14/12/15 19:33, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> * Do SDK releases fit on -announce?
>>>
>>
>> I guess they could -- how many of those are we expecting ?
>>
>>
> So far it looks close to zero emails :)
Tom Fifield wrote:
> ... and back to this thread after a few weeks :)
>
> The conclusions I saw were:
> * Audience for openstack-announce should be "users/non-dev"
> * Service project releases announcements are good
> * Client library release announcements good
> * Security announcements are good
On 2015-11-20 11:41:43 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
> > * Important security advisories
>
> Actually it's all security advisories, not just "important" ones.
[...]
I would counter that the VMT don't bother to write and publish
"unimportant" security advisories,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> We could definitely go back to "the place users wanting to keep up with
> upstream news directly affecting them should subscribe to", and post only:
>
> - user-facing service releases (type:service deliverables), on
Tom Fifield wrote:
> I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list.
>
> We describe the list as:
>
> """
> Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the
> OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack Security Team.
>
> This is a low-traffic, read-only list.
> """
Hi all,
I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list.
We describe the list as:
"""
Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the
OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack Security Team.
This is a low-traffic, read-only list.
"""
Up until July 2015, it was
On 2015-11-19 11:00 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> Personally, I no longer consider this volume "low traffic" :)
>
> In addition, I have been recently receiving feedback that users have
> been unsubscribing from or deleting without reading the list's posts.
>
> That isn't good news, given this is
Excerpts from Tom Fifield's message of 2015-11-19 20:00:20 -0800:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to get your thoughts about the OpenStack-Announce list.
>
> We describe the list as:
>
> """
> Subscribe to this list to receive important announcements from the
> OpenStack Release Team and OpenStack
14 matches
Mail list logo